Sustained Citizen Science From Research to Solutions: A New Impact Model for the Social Sciences

Abstract

Participatory research offers a valuable opportunity for collaboration between universities and citizens. It allows people with diverse educational and professional trajectories outside of academia to become partners in the research process, leading to multiple positive outcomes such as enhanced capacity building, contextually sensitive research design, and effective dissemination of findings. The chain of activities in the standard version of participatory research, however, stops short of developing solutions for improved quality of life, without making clear how enhanced capacities or locally embedded research findings will translate into tangible change for the communities where the research takes place. This shortcoming, we claim, is linked to the relatively short-term nature of most participatory research, as well as the scarcity of institutional structures and funding schemes to support the development of community-led solutions in the long run. The present article demonstrates that another model of research is both possible and desirable. It does this by presenting the outcomes of a sustained, long-term collaboration between university researchers and citizen social scientists in Beirut, Lebanon. The sustained nature of this work – running for over 3 years at the time of writing – has enabled our team to roll out a substantial programme of qualitative and quantitative data collection on prosperity and quality of life, and to subsequently use the findings and experience gained to create a set of interventions that address pressing challenges. We specifically argue that sustained, open-ended work on multiple activities – from research design and data collection, to data analysis, design of interventions and more – leads to accumulation of skills and experiences within the team, which can then be channelled towards implementing high quality interventions. This new model of impact for social science research prioritises partnership between universities and citizens, while highlighting the potential of such partnership to lead to solutions that make a real difference.

Developing a Women's Thought Collective methodology for health research: The roles and responsibilities of researchers in the reflexive co‐production of knowledge

“…42 Second, the short-term and scarce nature of health-related funding and implementation cycles contracts the scope for such work (an execution error) because it does not afford the time and care needed for collaboration 43 that is sustained, open-ended, and able to transform civic arenas. 44 Both of these co-production 'errors' engender layers of cruel optimism.…”

“…The fact that much of what citizen scientists produce is ignored by scientists 41 is likely symptomatic of this, in addition to unwritten rules about whose expertise matters and whose does not 42 . Second, the short‐term and scarce nature of health‐related funding and implementation cycles contracts the scope for such work ( an execution error ) because it does not afford the time and care needed for collaboration 43 that is sustained, open‐ended, and able to transform civic arenas 44 . Both of these co‐production ‘errors’ engender layers of cruel optimism.…”