Sustainable trade promotion decisions under demand disruption in manufacturer-retailer supply chains

Wu, Jie; Chen, Zhuo; Ji, Xiang

doi:10.1007/s10479-018-2964-2

Cited by 41 publications

(37 citation statements)

References 82 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The formulation of appropriate strategies for managing disruptions such as supply, demand, production, and transportation disruptions was the main focus of a vast number of studies ( Albertzeth et al, 2020 , Wu et al, 2020 ). These strategies include supply chain planning for disruptions, response plans for minimizing impacts, and action plans for quick recovery.…”

Section: Research On Supply Chain Disruptionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Four strategies such as collaboration, redundancy, flexibility and agility are the main suggestions for managing disruptions ( Shekarian and Parast, 2020 ). Among these four, various collaboration practices are frequently suggested in the literature and are considered the most appropriate strategy for managing disruptions ( Shekarian and Parast, 2020 , Wu et al, 2020 ). A recent review ( Duong and Chong, 2020 ) identified seven collaboration practices that were used by commercial supply chains for responding and recovering from supply chain disruptions: (i) contractual and economics practices; (ii) joint practices; (iii) relationship management; (iv) technological and information sharing practices; (v) governance practices; (vi) assessment practices; and (vii) supply chain design (integrated operations).…”

Section: Research On Supply Chain Disruptionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: A systematic review

Chowdhury

Paul

Kaisar

et al. 2021

Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Re

664

548

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The global spread of the novel coronavirus, also known as the COVID-19 pandemic, has had a devastating impact on supply chains. Since the pandemic started, scholars have been researching and publishing their studies on the various supply-chain-related issues raised by COVID-19. However, while the number of articles on this subject has been steadily increasing, due to the absence of any systematic literature reviews, it remains unclear what aspects of this disruption have already been studied and what aspects still need to be investigated. The present study systematically reviews existing research on the COVID-19 pandemic in supply chain disciplines. Through a rigorous and systematic search, we identify 74 relevant articles published on or before 28 September 2020. The synthesis of the findings reveals that four broad themes recur in the published work: namely, impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, resilience strategies for managing impacts and recovery, the role of technology in implementing resilience strategies, and supply chain sustainability in the light of the pandemic. Alongside the synthesis of the findings, this study describes the methodologies, context, and theories used in each piece of research. Our analysis reveals that there is a lack of empirically designed and theoretically grounded studies in this area; hence, the generalizability of the findings, thus far, is limited. Moreover, the analysis reveals that most studies have focused on supply chains for high-demand essential goods and healthcare products, while low-demand items and SMEs have been largely ignored. We also review the literature on prior epidemic outbreaks and other disruptions in supply chain disciplines. By considering the findings of these articles alongside research on the COVID-19 pandemic, this study offers research questions and directions for further investigation. These directions can guide scholars in designing and conducting impactful research in the field.

show abstract

Section: Research On Supply Chain Disruptionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Research On Supply Chain Disruptionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: A systematic review

Chowdhury

Paul

Kaisar

et al. 2021

Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Re

664

548

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The provision of NR is equally important to the economic development of the developing world, where the developing world depends on the availability of resources for the impressive gross domestic product (Danish, Baloch, Mahmood, & Zhang, 2019). The study of Wu, Chen, and Ji (2018) revealed that growth affected the consumption of NR. To sustain NR, countries turning form conservation to depletion.…”

Section: Brief Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nexus between carbon emission, financial development, and access to electricity: Incorporating the role of natural resources and population growth

Khan

Latif

et al. 2020

Journal of Public Affairs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study explores the nexus between financial development, access to electricity, and CO2 emissions in Pakistan over the period from 1990 to 2015, incorporating the role of natural resources and population growth. We checked the stationarity of the data by using three different unit root tests (ADF, Phillip Pesaran, and DG‐FLS). Long‐ and short‐run elasticities have been determined through auto‐regressive distributive lag (ARDL) method. The empirical results confirmed that financial development and access to electricity increase CO2 emissions and deteriorate the environmental quality. In addition, the population growth is responsible for growing CO2 emissions in Pakistan, while natural resources have insignificant relation with CO2 emissions. Furthermore, bidirectional causality exists between population growth and natural resources, whereas unidirectional causality is detected among financial development and CO2 emissions, natural resources and population growth, and financial development and population growth. The newly developed findings suggest helpful policy implications to adequately address the issue of CO2 emissions without compromising economic development.

show abstract

“…Blattberg and Neslin [2] delineated three types of sales promotions: trade promotion from the manufacturer to the retailer, retailer promotion from the retailer to the consumers, and consumer promotion from the manufacturer to the consumers (manufacturer promotion). As we see in Table 1, there are many researches which have considered trade promotion [1,13,16,28,29,32] or retailer promotion [17,18,25,30] individually. In a different way, Yang et al [34] consider two types of sales promotion: manufacturer's promotion (the manufacturer can promote via a direct channel) and retailer's promotion (the retailer can promote via a retail channel) independently.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Finally, in Section 6, we present our conclusion in detail and provide some suggestions and comments for future research. [18] x 2 N/I Kurata and Yue [13] x 1 Promotional budget dependent Tsao and Sheen [30] x 1 promotional effort-induced demand Su and Geunes [28] x 1 Price discount, outcome dependent Pal et al [22] x 1 Price, product quality, promotional effort dependent Yang et al [33] x x 1 Random variable, promotional efforts, rebate face dependent Sana [25] x 1 Random variable and sales teams' initiatives dependent Tsao and Lu [29] x 4, Promotional cost dependent Lin [16] x 1 Promotional cost dependent Bai et al [1] x 2 Price, time, promotional effort dependent Wu et al [32] x 3 Price dependent Fang and Yuan [6] x 1 Time dependent Liu et al [17] x 2 Quality and sales effort dependent Yang et al [34] x x Price dependent Pakhira et al [23] x 1 Promotional cost and trade credit dependent Nouri et al [19] x…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Two-level promotion and ordering policy in a supply chain

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research develops two models to consider retailer sales promotion and manufacturer trade promotion under demand uncertainty. The objective of the first model is to determine the retailer’s optimal promotional effort and order quantity while maximizing the retailer’s profit under exogenous trade promotion. The second model extends the first to consider the manufacturer’s endogenous trade promotion decisions. For these models, three different trade promotion policies (off-invoice, scan-back, unsold-discount) have been compared to identify the policy that can increase the manufacturer’s and the retailer’s profits. For the model with exogenous trade promotion, the retailer’s promotional effort level, order quantity, and profit are highest under the off-invoice trade promotion policy. With respect to the manufacturer’s endogenous trade promotion decisions, the retailer’s promotional effort level, order quantity, and profit, and the manufacturer’s profit are higher under the off-invoice policy than under the scan-backs policy. When comparing the three different trade promotion policies, we also find that the wholesale price is a key factor that influences a manufacturer’s profit. Our research sheds light on the importance of trade promotion policy in supply chain management.

show abstract

Sustainable trade promotion decisions under demand disruption in manufacturer-retailer supply chains

Cited by 41 publications

References 82 publications

COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: A systematic review

COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: A systematic review

Nexus between carbon emission, financial development, and access to electricity: Incorporating the role of natural resources and population growth

Two-level promotion and ordering policy in a supply chain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About