Sustainability of Vibration Mitigation Methods Using Meta-Materials/Structures along Railway Corridors Exposed to Adverse Weather Conditions

Abstract

Noises and vibrations caused by operating transport systems can seriously affect people’s health and environmental ecosystems. Railway-induced vibrations in urban settings can cause disturbances and damages to surrounding buildings, infrastructures and residents. Over many decades, a number of mitigation methods have been proposed to attenuate vibrations at the source, in the transmission path, or at the receiver. In fact, low-frequency or ground-borne vibration is turned out to be more difficult to be mitigated at source, whilst some attenuation measures in propagation path can be applicable. To broaden the mitigating range at the low-frequency band, the applications of meta-materials/structures have been established. In railway systems, periodic structures or resonators can be installed near the protected buildings to isolate the vibrations. Despite a large number of proposed attenuation methods, the sustainability of those methods has not been determined. Based on rational engineering assumptions, the discounted cash flows in construction and maintenance processes are analysed in this study to evaluate lifecycle costs and the quantity of materials and fuels, as well as the amount of carbon emissions. This study is the world’s first to identify the efficacy and sustainability of some transmission path attenuation methods in both normal and adverse weather conditions. It reveals that geofoam trenches and wave impeding blocks are the most suitable methods. Although metamaterial applications can significantly mitigate a wider range of lower frequency vibrations, the total cost and carbon emissions are relatively high. It is necessary to significantly modify design parameters in order to enable low-cost and low-carbon meta-materials/structures in reality.

Geosynthetic Solutions for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure Development

“…Although not explicitly examined, as a large portion of the carbon footprint results from the material consumption of mitigation measures, the geosynthetic solutions typically produce less carbon footprint, i.e., less than 10% of conventional approaches such as resonator, concrete-filled trench, concrete pile stiffening, etc. [41].…”

Dynamic Shear Strength Characteristics of Lightweight Sand-EPS Soil

“…Meanwhile, from clothing packaging to food packaging, expanded polystyrene (EPS) is being used on an increasing scale, especially after COVID-19, which further dramatically increased the use of disposable EPS [2]. The reutilization of waste EPS packing boxes to produce lightweight sand-EPS soil (LSES) is a good way to protect the environment and to solve the engineering geology challenge of marine deep soft sediments [3].…”

Life Cycle Sustainability Assessments of an Innovative FRP Composite Footbridge

“…The UK government put forward the Climate Change Act in 2008, later updated in 2019, as a legally binding target to reduce the UK's greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 to 100% lower than the 1990 baseline [3]. To meet this target, the industry is looking to move away from conventional construction and be accountable for its impact [4][5][6][7][8]. Sustainable development is generally defined as "development which meets the need of the present without compromising the ability of the future generations to meet their own needs" [9,10].…”