2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainability indicator development—Science or political negotiation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
167
0
24

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 273 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
167
0
24
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies build on the findings that the production of indicators based on a purely scientific process tends to ignore or underestimate the importance of the political dimension (Rametsteiner et al, 2011). This would explain why the resulting indicators are not viewed as legitimate by decision makers and civil society.…”
Section: Indicators Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These studies build on the findings that the production of indicators based on a purely scientific process tends to ignore or underestimate the importance of the political dimension (Rametsteiner et al, 2011). This would explain why the resulting indicators are not viewed as legitimate by decision makers and civil society.…”
Section: Indicators Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The content and priorities of the indicators thus reflect the affiliations of the actors involved in the process (Hunter, 1997). In the alternative approach, the formulation of indicators becomes a process of knowledge production with a scientific foundation, combined with the setting of a political and operational standard (Rametsteiner et al, 2011) that facilitates the recognition and scientific and social legitimacy of the indicators.…”
Section: Indicators Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations