Sustainability Considerations for Health Research and Analytic Data Infrastructures

Abstract

Introduction:The United States has made recent large investments in creating data infrastructures to support the important goals of patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) and comparative effectiveness research (CER), with still more investment planned. These initial investments, while critical to the creation of the infrastructures, are not expected to sustain them much beyond the initial development. To provide the maximum benefit, the infrastructures need to be sustained through innovative financing models while providing value to PCOR and CER researchers.Sustainability Factors:Based on our experience with creating flexible sustainability strategies (i.e., strategies that are adaptive to the different characteristics and opportunities of a resource or infrastructure), we define specific factors that are important considerations in developing a sustainability strategy. These factors include assets, expansion, complexity, and stakeholders. Each factor is described, with examples of how it is applied. These factors are dimensions of variation in different resources, to which a sustainability strategy should adapt.Summary Observations:We also identify specific important considerations for maintaining an infrastructure, so that the long-term intended benefits can be realized. These observations are presented as lessons learned, to be applied to other sustainability efforts. We define the lessons learned, relating them to the defined sustainability factors as interactions between factors.Conclusion and Next Steps:Using perspectives and experiences from a diverse group of experts, we define broad characteristics of sustainability strategies and important observations, which can vary for different projects. Other descriptions of adaptive, flexible, and successful models of collaboration between stakeholders and data infrastructures can expand this framework by identifying other factors for sustainability, and give more concrete directions on how sustainability can be best achieved.

A Digital Architecture for a Network-Based Learning Health System – Integrating Chronic Care Management, Quality Improvement, and Research

“…Finally, while most DRNs receive a significant amount of startup funding, sustainability is always a concern (improvement networks face similar issues). 43 IT staff at ImproveCareNow care centers are not paid to create the EHR extracts that are uploaded to the registry. It is unlikely that a DRN would be able to provide data to an outside network free of charge, and it is unknown whether improvement networks could absorb this additional cost.…”

A Framework to Support the Sharing and Re-Use of Computable Phenotype Definitions Across Health Care Delivery and Clinical Research Applications

“…Wilcox et al assert that the costs for sustaining research infrastructure can be covered if value can be created. 35 Thus, clear demonstrations of reduced workload, reduced costs, or faster development resulting from the reuse of phenotype definitions might motivate potential users.…”

Facilitating biomedical researchers’ interrogation of electronic health record data: Ideas from outside of biomedical informatics

“…The national center for education statistics has summarized the tradeoffs between centralized and federated data repositories [139]. Briefly, centralized systems ease data governance, increase data retrieval performance, provide uniform data for efficient data mining, entail a high-cost burden for ensuring data currency and completeness, and are harder to scale for evolving data needs and different data access workflows [140]. Many institutions have centralized data repositories such as STRIDE [110].…”