2004
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI)

Abstract: Susceptibility differences between tissues can be utilized as a new type of contrast in MRI that is different from spin density, T 1 -, or T 2 -weighted imaging. Signals from substances with different magnetic susceptibilities compared to their neighboring tissue will become out of phase with these tissues at sufficiently long echo times (TEs). Thus, phase imaging offers a means of enhancing contrast in MRI. Specifically, the phase images themselves can provide excellent contrast between gray matter (GM) and w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
1,201
4
10

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,422 publications
(1,222 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
7
1,201
4
10
Order By: Relevance
“…We will refer to this filter combination as DORK with SHARP. The three other alternative spatio-temporal filters were: (ii) complex regression of global phase changes in image space (NVR, ); (iii) 2D Gaussian homodyne high-pass filtering of the unwrapped phase with a filter width of 6 mm (homodyne, (Deistung et al, 2008;Haacke et al, 2004;Noll et al, 1991)) and (iv) removal of static phase components by complex division (Tomasi and Caparelli, 2007) in combination with 8 th order 2D polynomial high-pass filtering of the resulting relative phase images (RELPOLY, (Bianciardi et al, 2011)). The time-series from the multiple fMRI runs were co-registered using the FLIRT tool (Jenkinson et al, 2002) by aligning the motion correction reference volumes (i.e.…”
Section: Preprocessing Pipeline Of the Time-seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will refer to this filter combination as DORK with SHARP. The three other alternative spatio-temporal filters were: (ii) complex regression of global phase changes in image space (NVR, ); (iii) 2D Gaussian homodyne high-pass filtering of the unwrapped phase with a filter width of 6 mm (homodyne, (Deistung et al, 2008;Haacke et al, 2004;Noll et al, 1991)) and (iv) removal of static phase components by complex division (Tomasi and Caparelli, 2007) in combination with 8 th order 2D polynomial high-pass filtering of the resulting relative phase images (RELPOLY, (Bianciardi et al, 2011)). The time-series from the multiple fMRI runs were co-registered using the FLIRT tool (Jenkinson et al, 2002) by aligning the motion correction reference volumes (i.e.…”
Section: Preprocessing Pipeline Of the Time-seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent studies have shown that the use of MRI signal phase in gradient-echo (GRE) MRI can improve contrast MRI in specific human brain structures, including veins and iron-rich regions (10)(11)(12)(13)(14). Preliminary studies have also shown a substantial contrast between WM and cortical GM (11,15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conventional GRE, a magnitude image combines contributions from transverse (T 2 ) relaxation (which leads to signal decay) as well as from loss of signal because of coherence loss caused by the local resonance frequency offset or B o shift. The latter originates, at least in part, from the magnetic susceptibility differences between tissues (10,11). Phase imaging allows increased dynamic range in detection of these off-resonance effects by directly measuring the change in frequency offset.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A susceptibility weighted image was acquired with an in‐plane resolution of 0.5 × 0.5mm 2 and a slice thickness of 1.0mm (TR 28ms, TE 20ms, Flip angle 15deg, GRAPPA 2, matrix size 384 × 312 × 52; Haacke et al, 2004; Reichenbach et al, 1997). Finally, a high‐resolution (1.0mm isotropic) anatomical image was acquired using an MPRAGE sequence (TR 2.4s, TE 2.18ms, TI 1040ms, Flip angle 8deg, GRAPPA 2, matrix size 224 × 224 × 192; Mugler and Brookeman, 1990).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) can be used to probe iron and myelin differences in the cortex and, additionally, to locate veins. SWI is a recent MR technique detecting susceptibility differences in the brain (Haacke et al, 2004; Reichenbach et al, 1997). SWI combines magnitude and phase information of the complex T 2 * weighted images to enhance the contrast of paramagnetic substances, such as deoxygenated hemoglobin and iron, with respect to the surrounding diamagnetic tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%