Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: A five year experience

Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Women With Cervical Cancer

“…Operating time was longer and EBL was lower in the RRH cases. The 3-year PFS was similar among groups (91.3% in the RRH group vs 89.9% in the LRH group, P = 0.778).Mendivil et al30 published very recently a study on 49 patients who underwent LRH, 58 who were managed via RRH, and 39 patients who were treated with ARH. The LRH patients had a significantly shorter operative time than did the RRH and ARH patients.…”

Tratamiento radical mínimamente invasivo en cáncer de cuello uterino invasor: experiencia de la Clínica Ginecotocológica A

“…La preservación nerviosa demostró tener seguridad oncológica (20,21) . El tiempo quirúrgico promedio fue de 261 minutos.…”

Minimally Invasive Surgery to Treat Gynecological Cancer

“…36 The number of lymph nodes removed was similar in most studies, although some of them observed a significantly higher number of nodes retrieved by robotic-assisted laparoscopy. 25,28,35 According to few studies reporting the conversion rate, it seems to be similar between laparoscopy and robotics. The data available in the literature when comparing conventional and robotic-assisted laparoscopy show a median follow-up, which ranges between 12 and 60 months, with a progression free survival between 81.4% and 90% and overall survival ranging between 89% and 97%.…”

“…As in endometrial cancer, data regarding mean surgical time are conflicting. Although some studies found significantly longer operative time with robotics, 26,30,32,35 other found the opposite results 24,28,33 or no differences between conventional or robotic-assisted laparoscopy. There were no significant differences in EBL, with the exemption of 3 studies, which found significantly less EBL with robotics versus conventional laparoscopy.…”