2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2021.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival analyses in cardiovascular research, part II: statistical methods in challenging situations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The follow-up period for the clinical outcomes started at day 91 to allow timely fulfillment of the process performance measures to avoid immortal time bias. 26 Patients were followed from day 91 after discharge date (inpatients)/first appointment date (outpatients) until death, migration, or 365 days.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The follow-up period for the clinical outcomes started at day 91 to allow timely fulfillment of the process performance measures to avoid immortal time bias. 26 Patients were followed from day 91 after discharge date (inpatients)/first appointment date (outpatients) until death, migration, or 365 days.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stratified Cox proportional hazard models were used because the baseline risk and hazards in each cohort constituting the HOMAGE cohort were different and unrelated. 16 Age, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were categorized due to non-linearity. A backward selection procedure was applied to determine the variables to be included in the multivariable models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to differences in duration of follow‐up between each cohort, the cohorts were added as strata in the Cox regression models for the HOMAGE database. The stratified Cox proportional hazard models were used because the baseline risk and hazards in each cohort constituting the HOMAGE cohort were different and unrelated 16 . Age, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were categorized due to non‐linearity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scientific validity of the study is limited by the sample size and the inherent failure to correct for unknown additional confounders. Second, all-cause mortality was a competing risk for recurrent myocardial infarction in our study [ 19 , 20 ], and to some extent affects the evaluation of the utility of beta-blockers for recurrent myocardial infarction; future studies need to take this issue of competing risks into account. Third, our study is a retrospective study and it is difficult to obtain information about the use of beta-blockers over the entire follow-up period in patients with AMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%