Survey of the 1999 surface plasmon resonance biosensor literature

Abstract

The application of surface plasmon resonance biosensors in life sciences and pharmaceutical research continues to increase. This review provides a comprehensive list of the commercial 1999 SPR biosensor literature and highlights emerging applications that are of general interest to users of the technology. Given the variability in the quality of published biosensor data, we present some general guidelines to help increase confidence in the results reported from biosensor analyses. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Structure and function of the N-terminal extension of the formin INF2

“…Purified CaM was injected at different concentrations ranging from 13.2 nM to 9.6 µM in duplicate, at a flowrate of 50 µl/min, with an association time of 60 s followed by dissociation for 60 s. After that, the sensor chip was regenerated by injection of 10 mM glycine–HCl, pH 1.7, with a contact time of 12 s. The signal obtained in the reference cell was subtracted from each of the sample sensorgrams and, afterwards, the signal corresponding to the injection of the buffer was also subtracted. Sensorgrams with different concentrations of CaM were overlaid, aligned and analyzed with BIAevaluation Software 4.1, using the double-reference method [ 53 ]. In all sensorgrams, the binding reached the equilibrium very quickly and the complete dissociation was achieved in a few seconds, due to the very fast association (K a) and dissociation ( K d ) constant rates, which were beyond the detection limits of the equipment.…”

Structure and function of the N-terminal extension of the formin INF2

“…Purified CaM was injected at different concentrations ranging from 13.2 nM to 9.6 µM in duplicate, at a flowrate of 50 µl/min, with an association time of 60 s followed by dissociation for 60 s. After that, the sensor chip was regenerated by injection of 10 mM glycine–HCl, pH 1.7, with a contact time of 12 s. The signal obtained in the reference cell was subtracted from each of the sample sensorgrams and, afterwards, the signal corresponding to the injection of the buffer was also subtracted. Sensorgrams with different concentrations of CaM were overlaid, aligned and analyzed with BIAevaluation Software 4.1, using the double-reference method [ 53 ]. In all sensorgrams, the binding reached the equilibrium very quickly and the complete dissociation was achieved in a few seconds, due to the very fast association (K a) and dissociation ( K d ) constant rates, which were beyond the detection limits of the equipment.…”

A Stimuli-Responsive, Binary Reagent System for Rapid Isolation of Protein Biomarkers

“…These analyses allowed assessment of the impact of polymer conjugation on the Ab binding properties. The association, dissociation, and long dissociation kinetic "sensorgrams" were overlaid (Supporting Figure 2) with fitted curves 38 for the unconjugated Ab and polymer−Ab conjugates. Both the association and dissociation phases fit the 1:1 binding model, which indicated that each Ab sample was homogeneous in its p24 binding properties.…”

Plasmonic biosensors

“…are necessary to detect binding events that occur on the surface. Anyone involved in film-based SPR biosensing should consider the reviews by Rich and Myszka [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] as 'must read' material. In a heroic effort, they published annual reviews of all film-based SPR biosensor research (∼1000 articles per year) for over a decade (1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011) during the explosive growth period of SPR.…”

“…Anyone involved in film‐based SPR biosensing should consider the reviews by Rich and Myszka as ‘must read’ material. In a heroic effort, they published annual reviews of all film‐based SPR biosensor research (∼1000 articles per year) for over a decade (1999–2011) during the explosive growth period of SPR.…”

Structure and function of the N-terminal extension of the formin INF2

“…Purified CaM was injected at different concentrations ranging from 13.2 nM to 9.6 µM in duplicate, at a flowrate of 50 µl/min, with an association time of 60 s followed by dissociation for 60 s. After that, the sensor chip was regenerated by injection of 10 mM glycine–HCl, pH 1.7, with a contact time of 12 s. The signal obtained in the reference cell was subtracted from each of the sample sensorgrams and, afterwards, the signal corresponding to the injection of the buffer was also subtracted. Sensorgrams with different concentrations of CaM were overlaid, aligned and analyzed with BIAevaluation Software 4.1, using the double-reference method [ 53 ]. In all sensorgrams, the binding reached the equilibrium very quickly and the complete dissociation was achieved in a few seconds, due to the very fast association (K a) and dissociation ( K d ) constant rates, which were beyond the detection limits of the equipment.…”

A Stimuli-Responsive, Binary Reagent System for Rapid Isolation of Protein Biomarkers

“…These analyses allowed assessment of the impact of polymer conjugation on the Ab binding properties. The association, dissociation, and long dissociation kinetic "sensorgrams" were overlaid (Supporting Figure 2) with fitted curves 38 for the unconjugated Ab and polymer−Ab conjugates. Both the association and dissociation phases fit the 1:1 binding model, which indicated that each Ab sample was homogeneous in its p24 binding properties.…”

Plasmonic biosensors

“…are necessary to detect binding events that occur on the surface. Anyone involved in film-based SPR biosensing should consider the reviews by Rich and Myszka [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] as 'must read' material. In a heroic effort, they published annual reviews of all film-based SPR biosensor research (∼1000 articles per year) for over a decade (1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011) during the explosive growth period of SPR.…”

“…Anyone involved in film‐based SPR biosensing should consider the reviews by Rich and Myszka as ‘must read’ material. In a heroic effort, they published annual reviews of all film‐based SPR biosensor research (∼1000 articles per year) for over a decade (1999–2011) during the explosive growth period of SPR.…”

Structure and function of the N-terminal extension of the formin INF2

“…Purified CaM was injected at different concentrations ranging from 13.2 nM to 9.6 µM in duplicate, at a flowrate of 50 µl/min, with an association time of 60 s followed by dissociation for 60 s. After that, the sensor chip was regenerated by injection of 10 mM glycine–HCl, pH 1.7, with a contact time of 12 s. The signal obtained in the reference cell was subtracted from each of the sample sensorgrams and, afterwards, the signal corresponding to the injection of the buffer was also subtracted. Sensorgrams with different concentrations of CaM were overlaid, aligned and analyzed with BIAevaluation Software 4.1, using the double-reference method [ 53 ]. In all sensorgrams, the binding reached the equilibrium very quickly and the complete dissociation was achieved in a few seconds, due to the very fast association (K a) and dissociation ( K d ) constant rates, which were beyond the detection limits of the equipment.…”

A Stimuli-Responsive, Binary Reagent System for Rapid Isolation of Protein Biomarkers

“…These analyses allowed assessment of the impact of polymer conjugation on the Ab binding properties. The association, dissociation, and long dissociation kinetic "sensorgrams" were overlaid (Supporting Figure 2) with fitted curves 38 for the unconjugated Ab and polymer−Ab conjugates. Both the association and dissociation phases fit the 1:1 binding model, which indicated that each Ab sample was homogeneous in its p24 binding properties.…”

Plasmonic biosensors

“…are necessary to detect binding events that occur on the surface. Anyone involved in film-based SPR biosensing should consider the reviews by Rich and Myszka [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] as 'must read' material. In a heroic effort, they published annual reviews of all film-based SPR biosensor research (∼1000 articles per year) for over a decade (1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011) during the explosive growth period of SPR.…”

“…Anyone involved in film‐based SPR biosensing should consider the reviews by Rich and Myszka as ‘must read’ material. In a heroic effort, they published annual reviews of all film‐based SPR biosensor research (∼1000 articles per year) for over a decade (1999–2011) during the explosive growth period of SPR.…”