2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-50347-5_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey of Preprocessing Techniques and Classification Approaches in Online Signature Verification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the verification process, these signatures are utilized for training and testing. In order to provide both training and testing samples, the number of genuine signatures should be large enough [30].…”
Section: Source Of Data and Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the verification process, these signatures are utilized for training and testing. In order to provide both training and testing samples, the number of genuine signatures should be large enough [30].…”
Section: Source Of Data and Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, online approaches are based on dynamic characteristics such as azimuth, tip pressure, and altitude. Numerous digitizing devices (e.g., tablets, smartwatches, and IMU-equipped pens) have been used to capture stylus or wrist motion data in previous research [ 3 , 4 , 8 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]. Recently, device-free approaches have drawn the attention of researchers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior research [ 8 ] seized the opportunity of the sensing capability in popular wearable devices, using a a smartwatch that captures the motion of the wrist via HSV IMU sensors. Compared to other research [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ], this novel approach solves hardware inaccessibility deficiencies. However, it also has the following weaknesses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations