2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01484.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical Myths in Dermatology

Abstract: The authors have indicated no significant interest with commercial supporters.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding length, the classic width ratio of 3 to 4:1 may not be required depending on skin laxity. 7…”
Section: Steps Of the Excisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding length, the classic width ratio of 3 to 4:1 may not be required depending on skin laxity. 7…”
Section: Steps Of the Excisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Absorbable sutures may be used without significantly increased risk of infection, inflammation, or dehiscence if they are removed as per standard protocol (ie, 5–7 days on the face). 7…”
Section: Steps Of the Excisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Reflecting, auditing and critically appraising any surgical technique or practice is vital to promote the highest standards in the art of reconstructive surgery. Questioning why we do things the way we do, and challenging conventional perceived dogma 4 will ensure our patients continue to receive the very best care. One such example is the use of tie‐over bolster dressings after full‐thickness skin grafting, which has generally been perceived as a necessary requirement to ensure graft survival.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%