1990
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80618-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical management of complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy with precut papillotomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
5

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
32
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally, duodenal perforations have been managed surgically 19 ; however, in the past decade, management of limited esophageal, colonic, and even duodenal perforations has evolved toward a more selective approach. 7,20,21 The surgical procedure was selected, based on mechanism and degree of injury. Some authors performed pyloric exclusion and gastrojejunostomy in any patients with duodenal perforation and failed conservative management, 13 whereas duodenal diversion was used more frequently in patients with peri-Vaterian perforations and those operated on late.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditionally, duodenal perforations have been managed surgically 19 ; however, in the past decade, management of limited esophageal, colonic, and even duodenal perforations has evolved toward a more selective approach. 7,20,21 The surgical procedure was selected, based on mechanism and degree of injury. Some authors performed pyloric exclusion and gastrojejunostomy in any patients with duodenal perforation and failed conservative management, 13 whereas duodenal diversion was used more frequently in patients with peri-Vaterian perforations and those operated on late.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Furthermore, the rate of mortality after ERCP is 1.0% to 1.5%, 2,3 and the most serious complication after ERCP is perforation: Although ERCP-related perforations are rare with an incidence of 0.35% to 2.1%, it presents high mortality rate up to 25%. [3][4][5] For the management of ERCP-related perforations, some authors recommend primary surgical operation [6][7][8] whereas others promote conservative managemrnt. 2,9,10 Recently, Fatima et al 11 reported that most perforations (70%) secondary to periampullary endoscopic interventions can be managed nonoperatively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, over the past decade, cases of successful conservative management for carefully selected patients have been reported [6]. In this study, we present the largest published series from a single U.S. medical center of ERCP-related duodenal perforations based on clinical and radiologic criteria for presentation, location of the perforation, type of treatment, and final clinical outcome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En cuanto a las perforaciones tipo II, algunos autores recomiendan un tratamiento quirúrgico temprano (12), pero varios estudios recientes sugieren un tratamiento conservador, aún en casos de perforaciones retroperitoneales, que consiste en la colocación de un drenaje nasobiliar o de un stent biliar, la suspensión de la vía oral, la administración de antibióticos de amplio espectro, la nutrición parenteral y la estricta observación clínica durante 48 horas con realiza-ción de estudios tomográficos para evaluar la aparición de colecciones (10,11,13).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified