2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4816135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SURFRESIDE2: An ultrahigh vacuum system for the investigation of surface reaction routes of interstellar interest

Abstract: A new ultrahigh vacuum experiment is described to study atom and radical addition reactions in interstellar ice analogues for astronomically relevant temperatures. The new setup -SURFace REaction SImulation DEvice (SURFRESIDE 2 ) -allows a systematic investigation of solid state pathways resulting in the formation of molecules of astrophysical interest. The implementation of a double beam line makes it possible to expose deposited ice molecules to different atoms and/or radicals sequentially or at the same tim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
92
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
2
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here follows a brief description of the setups and the experimental methods, since both systems are discussed in detail elsewhere. 12,15 The use of two ultra-high vacuum (UHV) systems allows for complementary studies of selected interstellar relevant surface reactions. Therefore, a combination of experiments performed in these setups gives information on surface reactions occurring at different surface coverages (sub-monolayer vs. multilayer regime), on different substrates (gold, silicates, graphite, and ASW ice), and in different matrix environments (pure NO and NO 2 , NO in polar ice, and NO and NO 2 in apolar ice).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here follows a brief description of the setups and the experimental methods, since both systems are discussed in detail elsewhere. 12,15 The use of two ultra-high vacuum (UHV) systems allows for complementary studies of selected interstellar relevant surface reactions. Therefore, a combination of experiments performed in these setups gives information on surface reactions occurring at different surface coverages (sub-monolayer vs. multilayer regime), on different substrates (gold, silicates, graphite, and ASW ice), and in different matrix environments (pure NO and NO 2 , NO in polar ice, and NO and NO 2 in apolar ice).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reaction is relevant to astrochemistry in that it may explain CO 2 formation on interstellar dust grains by surface reactions and thus justifies its abundance in the solid phase. As mentioned in the introduction, the CO + O reaction competes with the CO + OH reaction (some experimental works have already been conducted by Ioppolo et al 2013), another non-energetic route to CO 2 formation in space. The CO + OH pathway seems to be facilitated by the low barrier of the reaction, but it has an other type of hindrance.…”
Section: Astrophysical Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calibration methods used so far are based on determining absolute atom densities in the exposing atom beam or, alternatively, on measuring the formation yield of final products in barrierless surface reactions followed by evaluation of original atom flux. Both these methods have been described in detail [125]. Fluxes can be varied by changing the pressure and power settings.…”
Section: P a G E | 18mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very recently, Ioppolo et al [125] directly compared the efficiency of two different carbon dioxide surface formation channels (CO+O and CO+OH) under the same experimental conditions using SURFRESIDE 2 . The use of a double beam line system is essential here and to interpret results from the simultaneous hydrogenation and oxygenation of solid CO, it is necessary to first distinguish the single contributions of the different reaction channels, i.e., O+H, CO+H, and CO+O.…”
Section: Co+oh Vs Co+omentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation