Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3313831.3376420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surfacing Visualization Mirages

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe that our type-based template search will dovetail with a metamorphic testing [58] based validation approach: by varying the parameters of a template and comparing the resulting images, a validation system could automatically identify errors at the intersection of data and encoding. Similarly, we suggest that templates likely ofer an opportune medium for applying visualization linting [32,57] to a visual analytics context, as the types expose the specifc arguments over which analysis could be conducted.…”
Section: Validation In Visualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that our type-based template search will dovetail with a metamorphic testing [58] based validation approach: by varying the parameters of a template and comparing the resulting images, a validation system could automatically identify errors at the intersection of data and encoding. Similarly, we suggest that templates likely ofer an opportune medium for applying visualization linting [32,57] to a visual analytics context, as the types expose the specifc arguments over which analysis could be conducted.…”
Section: Validation In Visualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual Analytics Process Keim et al 19 Sacha et al 20 Ribarsky and Fisher 22 Federico, Wagner et al 23 Lu et al 15 Lu et al 24 Sacha et al 7 Visualization during preprocessing Heer et al 28 Kandel et al 3 von Zernichow and Roman 29 Kandel et al 16 Visualization of data quality issues Templ et al 32 Eaton et al 33 Sjöbergh and Tanaka 34 Song and Szafir 35 McNutt et al 36 What the practitioners say Milani et al 8 Frequency (... of 17) 8 3 1 0 3 5 9…”
Section: Review and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complementing the previous, Item 4 ( Preprocessing impacts in the next phases ) considers the effects that the decisions made during the preprocessing may cause in later stages, similar to the discussion promoted by Crone et al 39 Even though the related work selected as part of Subsections Visualization during preprocessing and Visualization of data quality issues recognize the importance of preprocessing and its impacts on the overall process, most of them are concerned about how to enhance the capabilities of the data analysts while performing the cleaning and transformation tasks. Therefore, only Sacha et al, 7 McNutt et al, 36 and Milani et al 8 mention this topic, at least in an explicit manner. To illustrate, Sacha et al 7 present examples of pathways in the Machine Learning workflow, and during the Evaluate-Model process, they explain that a model-developer may wish to make some changes to what was set in the previous steps, which includes data preparation tasks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Correll et al [20] use simulation of data quality issues to highlight visual designs that may not robustly or reliably surface important properties in distributions. More generally, McNutt et al [49] propose the use of simulation results to automatically detect potentially misleading or unstable insights from visualization. An insight that is highly sensitive to particular conditions may not be reliable or generalizable.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analyses Of Visual Analyticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former is limited in the amount of detailed changes that can be noticed (an analyst may not notice small changes in proportions of documents belonging to particular topic clusters), and the latter is limited by the amount of the complexity that can be shown at once: term-topic matrices, for instance, often only show a small number of "top" tokens or topics, as it is infeasible to provide information about tens of thousands of tokens in detail in one view, and rely on interactivity or different ordering metrics to opportunistically surface different parts of the dataset [2]. These abstractions and summarizations can result in the potential for AVD "failures" [38] (see Figure 2) or visualization "mirages" [49], where either important updates to the model fail to be represented in a salient way in the resulting visualization, or the visualization of a model may be highly altered visually without much change to the underlying topics or classification accuracy.…”
Section: Visual Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%