2004
DOI: 10.1021/jp049220f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Structure of Hydroxylated and Sulfated Zirconia. A Periodic Density-Functional Study

Abstract: The surface structure of sulfated zirconia (SZ) is examined by density-functional theory (DFT) with periodic boundary conditions. Adsorption of H2O and SO3 (or H2SO4) on the (101) surface of tetragonal zirconia is studied for different loadings up to H2SO4·3H2O and 2H2SO4·2H2O per two surface unit cells (four Zr surface sites). The considered surface species include H2O, [H+,OH-], SO3, [H+,HSO4 -], [2H+,SO4 2-], [H+,HS2O7 -], and [2H+,S2O7 2-]. Statistical thermodynamics is used to evaluate the relative stabil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
128
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(59 reference statements)
9
128
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a model results in the calculated thickness of the sulfate layer being in excess of a monolayer coverage, which is not considered viable given the preparation route of the zirconia thin films and the fact that polymeric sulfates (higher than disulfates) were not observed by theoretical studies. [8] Previously reported IR studies indicate the adsorption of n-butane to occur on hydroxyl groups on sulfated zirconia. [73] Furthermore, XPS investigations on the interaction of sulfated zirconia thin films with n-butane under reactive conditions [74] show the attenuation of the zirconium signal to be greater than sulfur upon carbon deposition, which suggests adsorption on zirconia rather than coverage of the sulfate groups.…”
Section: Adsorption Sitesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Such a model results in the calculated thickness of the sulfate layer being in excess of a monolayer coverage, which is not considered viable given the preparation route of the zirconia thin films and the fact that polymeric sulfates (higher than disulfates) were not observed by theoretical studies. [8] Previously reported IR studies indicate the adsorption of n-butane to occur on hydroxyl groups on sulfated zirconia. [73] Furthermore, XPS investigations on the interaction of sulfated zirconia thin films with n-butane under reactive conditions [74] show the attenuation of the zirconium signal to be greater than sulfur upon carbon deposition, which suggests adsorption on zirconia rather than coverage of the sulfate groups.…”
Section: Adsorption Sitesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…XPS measurements show that the Zr:S atomic ratio (based on the Zr 3d and S 2p peak areas and reported atomic sensitivity factors [40]) of the activated sulfated zirconia thin film is 5.4. Assuming a homogeneous distribution of sulfur and zirconium within the thin film over the XPS measurement depth, a sulfate surface area of 31 Ų [71] and a zirconia surface 2 x 2 unit cell of 6.425 x 7.284 Å, [8] the sulfate groups are shown to cover ~33% of the surface, which is equivalent to a surface site density of ~1.1x10 18 S atoms/m². Alternatively assuming the sulfate groups are situated on the surface of zirconia crystals, a layer model that accounts for attenuation of the zirconium signal can be used to estimate the sulfate surface density.…”
Section: Adsorption Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sulfate can assume a multitude of structures on the surface of zirconia, depending on the loading and on the degree of hydration [29]. Sulfate can be removed or converted to an inactive sulfur-oxygen compound through dissolution in water [30], thermal decomposition [31], or reduction, for example by pyridine or benzene [32,33] or alkane reactants [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%