2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2012.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface roughness evolution on experimentally simulated faults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Renard et al . [] documented slickenside development and roughness variations during slip of initially smoothed Halite samples. Here we focus on the effects of slip distance on shear surface geometry under steady state sliding condition.…”
Section: Experimental Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Renard et al . [] documented slickenside development and roughness variations during slip of initially smoothed Halite samples. Here we focus on the effects of slip distance on shear surface geometry under steady state sliding condition.…”
Section: Experimental Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amongst these, the Fourier power spectrum method has proved to be the most reliable (e.g. Sagy et al, 2007;Candela et al, 2012, 2009, Bistacchi et al, 2011Renard et al, 2013Renard et al, , 2012Davidesko et al, 2014). The Fourier power spectrum P(k) (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments with marble (Badt et al, ) and granite (Amitrano & Schmittbuhl, ) showed that the slip in the brittle regime produces greater roughness (Hurst exponent values >0.7), attributed to plow‐related processes, such as gouge formation and striations. Similar slip experiments on halite and limestone, in contrast, develop relatively smoother roughness (Hurst exponent < 0.5), where asperities cause plastic strain localization in their neighborhood (Renard et al, ; Sagy et al, ). In both the cases plowing and gouge formation primarily determined the roughness characteristic on slip surfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%