Surface Replacement: The Hemicap Solution

Lenarz, Christopher J.; Shishani, Yousef; Gobezie, Reuben

doi:10.1053/j.sart.2011.01.003

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Moreover, intraoperative diameters and contour shapes allow the surgeon to not only cover the lesion effectively, but also fit the implant to the patient while preserving healthy bone and cartilage [13]. HemiCAP ® implant constitutes one of the new alternative options of “joint-preserving” surgeries, while protecting the patients’ anatomy with little bone bony resection [14]. In addition, the implant matches the patient’s anatomy and the related contour of the joint surface.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Focal anatomic resurfacing implantation for bilateral humeral and femoral heads’ avascular necrosis in a patient with Hodgkin’s lymphoma and literature review

Bilge

Doral

Miniaci

2015

International Journal of Surgery Case Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Focal anatomic resurfacing implantation for bilateral humeral and femoral heads’ avascular necrosis in a patient with Hodgkin’s lymphoma and literature review

Bilge

Doral

Miniaci

2015

International Journal of Surgery Case Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…While indicated for use in resurfacing for cases of avascular necrosis and focal post traumatic osteoarthritis, the implant has also been used in case reports for humeral bone loss in cases of anterior instability ( 56 , 57 ). This has also been used in a case of posterior instability following a fixed posterior shoulder dislocation, however further research is needed to determine outcomes following resurfacing for posterior instability ( 58 ).…”

Section: Bipolar Bone Loss and Posterior Glenohumeral Instabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Open treatment of posterior glenoid bone loss and bipolar bone loss

Testa¹,

Byrne²,

Petit³

et al. 2023

Ann Joint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Posterior glenohumeral instability is an increasingly common and challenging orthopaedic problem. While an arthroscopic soft tissue stabilization procedure (i.e., reverse Bankart repair) is effective in treating most cases of posterior instability, this procedure may be inadequate in shoulders with critical posterior glenoid bone loss (GBL), or in cases of an engaging reverse Hill-Sachs lesion. Thus, the purpose of the present manuscript was to report contemporary surgical approaches, techniques, and outcomes for the open treatment of glenoid or humeral head bone loss in posterior instability to help guide clinical decision making. Open osteoarticular augmentation procedures have emerged as a popular option to treat posterior bone loss, with bony auto- and allografts utilized from a variety of donor sites including iliac crest, scapular spine, acromion, distal clavicle, and distal tibia. The combination of glenoid retroversion and bone loss can be addressed with a posterior glenoid opening wedge osteotomy. Bipolar bone loss may be treated with a combination of the aforementioned techniques, in addition to a reverse remplissage, a modified McLaughlin procedure, or various arthroplasty-related options. Although short and mid-term outcomes are dependable, studies reporting long-term outcomes are sparse. Moreover, there is no current consensus regarding the most effective treatment of posterior shoulder instability in the setting of bone loss, and open surgical techniques continue to evolve. Further research is necessary to determine long-term effectiveness of these surgical options.

show abstract

“…Gerade bei jungen Patienten sind die Haltbarkeit der Prothese und die operativen Möglichkeiten bei Revisionseingriffen entscheidend. Diesbezüglich konnte gezeigt werden, dass die Revisionsrate bei HemiCAP®-Systemen im Vergleich zu Schaftprothesen geringer ist und zudem mehr Optionen bei Revisionseingriffen bestehen [ 5 , 10 ].…”

Section: Diskussionunclassified

Die Behandlung des Chondroblastoms im Humeruskopf

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ZusammenfassungWir präsentieren den Fall einer 22-jährigen Patientin mit einem histopathologisch gesicherten Chondroblastom des rechten Humeruskopfes. Um bei der jungen und funktionell anspruchsvollen Patientin eine möglichst schonende und anatomische Rekonstruktion der humeralen Gelenkfläche zu erzielen, ohne dabei auf einen totalendoprothetischen Gelenkersatz zurückzugreifen, implantierten wir nach intraläsionaler Kürettage des Chondroblastoms eine HemiCAP®. Die sehr guten funktionellen Kurzzeitergebnisse zeigen, dass dieser Therapieansatz eine sehr gute Behandlungsoption darstellen kann.

show abstract

Surface Replacement: The Hemicap Solution

Cited by 6 publications

References 22 publications

Focal anatomic resurfacing implantation for bilateral humeral and femoral heads’ avascular necrosis in a patient with Hodgkin’s lymphoma and literature review

Focal anatomic resurfacing implantation for bilateral humeral and femoral heads’ avascular necrosis in a patient with Hodgkin’s lymphoma and literature review

Open treatment of posterior glenoid bone loss and bipolar bone loss

Die Behandlung des Chondroblastoms im Humeruskopf

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About