1995
DOI: 10.1144/gsl.sp.1995.092.01.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface morphology characteristics of rock discontinuities with particular reference to their genesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most prominent techniques for quantitative fractography in metallurgy can be classified into three categories: stereoscopic methods (such as stereoscopic imaging and measurements and photogrammetric methods), projected images, and profile generation (Underwood, 1986). The first and third methods are predominantly applied when quantifying the fracture surface roughness of rocks (e.g., Aydan & Shimizu, 1995; Jessell et al, 1995; Nigon et al, 2017). A variety of roughness characterization parameters have been proposed, and the most commonly used parameters associated with linear profiles or surfaces are the root mean square roughness and the fractal dimension at multiple scales (e.g., Bobko & Ulm, 2008; Kassis & Sondergeld, 2010; Thomas, 1981).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most prominent techniques for quantitative fractography in metallurgy can be classified into three categories: stereoscopic methods (such as stereoscopic imaging and measurements and photogrammetric methods), projected images, and profile generation (Underwood, 1986). The first and third methods are predominantly applied when quantifying the fracture surface roughness of rocks (e.g., Aydan & Shimizu, 1995; Jessell et al, 1995; Nigon et al, 2017). A variety of roughness characterization parameters have been proposed, and the most commonly used parameters associated with linear profiles or surfaces are the root mean square roughness and the fractal dimension at multiple scales (e.g., Bobko & Ulm, 2008; Kassis & Sondergeld, 2010; Thomas, 1981).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%