2003
DOI: 10.1002/elps.200305648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface modification in microchip electrophoresis

Abstract: Different approaches and techniques for surface modification of microfluidic devices applied for microchip electrophoresis are reviewed. The main focus is on the improved electrophoretic separation by reducing analyte-wall interactions and manipulation of electroosmosis. Approaches and methods for permanent and dynamic surface modification of microfluidic devices, manufactured from glass, quartz and also different polymeric substrates, are described.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
199
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(200 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
199
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The various developed polymer surface modification techniques have been reported in several reviews (9)(10)(11)(12)(13). The most common modification methods fall into three categories: gas-phase processing, wet chemical methods and a combination of both.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The various developed polymer surface modification techniques have been reported in several reviews (9)(10)(11)(12)(13). The most common modification methods fall into three categories: gas-phase processing, wet chemical methods and a combination of both.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47 The surface potential of microchannels is important for electrokinetic phenomena and, therefore, controlled modification of the surface chemistry is very necessary. 5,48 Polyelectro-lyte adsorption from aqueous solution is an effective means to alter the surface potential of a channel. 49 Inorganic materials ͑metal oxides͒ are also good candidates for altering the surface potential as the point of zero charge differs depending on the oxide present.…”
Section: Microchannel Substratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a benefit almost exclusive to PMMA when compared to competing materials. PMMA is rated excellent for its biocompatibility, has therefore been used in many biomedical applications and microchip electrophoresis systems [19], and is a property advantageous for the current application as well. The comparatively high hydrophilicity of PMMA (contact angles with de-ionized water were reported to be between 71.7 ± 1.5 and 73.7 ± 1 for comparable PMMA grades by our group, [20] supports wetting properties in the micro fluidic domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%