2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface functionalized titanium thin films: Zeta-potential, protein adsorption and cell proliferation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
135
2
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
10
135
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As topographical features of bone particles could play a role in the surface interaction with small molecules, we assessed various sizes of particles to scale the specific surface area available for the drugbone surface interaction. Decreasing the micro structural heterogeneity of the bone powder is essential to maintain a uniform surface area for surface reactivity studies [21][22][23]. In addition, the adsorbent properties are functionally dependent on the particle size.…”
Section: Binding Of Raloxifene To Bone Powdermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As topographical features of bone particles could play a role in the surface interaction with small molecules, we assessed various sizes of particles to scale the specific surface area available for the drugbone surface interaction. Decreasing the micro structural heterogeneity of the bone powder is essential to maintain a uniform surface area for surface reactivity studies [21][22][23]. In addition, the adsorbent properties are functionally dependent on the particle size.…”
Section: Binding Of Raloxifene To Bone Powdermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. . fuse layer, was detected on bulk samples constructed with the same selective laser melting parameters and hydrothermal conditions [24]. When the nano-functionalized samples were immersed into an aqueous solution, its surface would immediately cover by hydroxyl groups [25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…At pH 7.4, ALN results in positive zeta potentials, while RIS results in negative ones as a function of concentration, most likely due to the differing nitrogen charges/species among the two bisphosphonates. (1) Cells may sense and react to this potential, (46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53) thus it is plausible that the different affinities and zeta-potentials influence osteoblastic function differently, quantitatively and/or qualitatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%