2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1631-0705(02)01304-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface flows of granular materials: a short introduction to some recent models

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A dry, low cohesive, granular system can be considered as a system with two layers; the standing layer, that forms the slope or the heap of the system, and the rolling layer, that is a thin layer that flows on the surface of the slope [1]. This behaviour can be modelled by means of a set of partial differential equations [8] that describe the evolution of these layers' thickness.…”
Section: Granular Systems Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A dry, low cohesive, granular system can be considered as a system with two layers; the standing layer, that forms the slope or the heap of the system, and the rolling layer, that is a thin layer that flows on the surface of the slope [1]. This behaviour can be modelled by means of a set of partial differential equations [8] that describe the evolution of these layers' thickness.…”
Section: Granular Systems Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional approach uses fluid models and particle system models for describing the flow of granular material and the formation of heaps [1]. However, granular systems show characteristics, such as the appearance of macroscopic patterns or avalanches, that cannot be properly modelled using this approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The closure relation making it possible to derive an equation for the static/flowing interface will be discussed and compared with different previously proposed models ( [7], [8], [2], [13], [12]). In particular, the existence of an energy equation for the different systems will be investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where γ is an empirical constant (see also [1], [2]). The model proposed by Boutreux, Raphaël and DeGennes (BRDG model, see [8]) differs in the form of the exchange term, where h is replaced by a thickness λ smaller than h,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final angle varies around a value a bit below the angle of repose of 28°(which we measured using the funnel method), in contrast to the much smaller final crater angle reported in experiments of solid ball impact and the collapse of a cylindrical cavity in granular media [83,120]. It has been shown from a phenomenological model (of the BCRE-type 4 ) that the final crater slope depends significantly on the initial condition [121,122]. Therefore, one plausible reason of our comparatively large final angle observations is that the transient crater angle never exceeds 50°, while the collapse of a cavity created by solid ball impact are typically at a higher impact energy which may well cause much larger transient angles.…”
Section: Crater Slopementioning
confidence: 53%