2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2sm26766g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface activity and aggregation of pristine and hydrophobically modified inulin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Particularly, previous reports declared that "The smaller aggregates, which in the case of inulins can be classifi ed as monomers and in the case of HMI as micelles, have dimensions below 15 nm." [ 53 ] It should be noted that in a previous work the size of INVITE 1 and INVITE 2 micelles were larger with respect to the present work. [ 31 ] This can be explained using the different applied method for micelles preparation.…”
Section: Size Stability Studies In Water By Dlscontrasting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Particularly, previous reports declared that "The smaller aggregates, which in the case of inulins can be classifi ed as monomers and in the case of HMI as micelles, have dimensions below 15 nm." [ 53 ] It should be noted that in a previous work the size of INVITE 1 and INVITE 2 micelles were larger with respect to the present work. [ 31 ] This can be explained using the different applied method for micelles preparation.…”
Section: Size Stability Studies In Water By Dlscontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…These data are consistent with the dimensions found for other micellar systems from hydrophobically modified Inulin (HMI). Particularly, previous reports declared that “The smaller aggregates, which in the case of inulins can be classified as monomers and in the case of HMI as micelles, have dimensions below 15 nm.”…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21 The instrumentally smeared experimental SAXS curves were tted to numerical models, convoluted with beam size and detector width effects. 22 A least squares routine based on the LevenbergMarquardt scheme was used. 23 The bilayer thickness was determined using a three-Gaussian prole based on the MCG model according to Pabst et al 24,25 Dynamic light scattering (DLS)…”
Section: Potentiometric Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 Our home-made fitting routines allow for convolution of the theoretical curves with our experimental detector width smearing function and use a Leverberg-Marquad scheme for minimization. 37 In the fitting we have let free the area per molecule Am, the hydrophobic length Lc, and the hydrophilic length Lh. Using these, we have calculated the hydrophobic electron density ρc, the number of water molecules in the polar region Nw, and the hydrophilic electron density ρh.…”
Section: Fluorescence Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%