2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2023.112714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppressing cancer by damaging cancer cell DNA using LED irradiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible explanation for this is that cancer cells can have high susceptibility to visible light exposure, which leads to intracellular metabolic alterations. 20 Furthermore, visible LED irradiation can activate the p53 signaling pathway, thereby suppressing cancer cell proliferation. 20 These facts, however, can be highly dependent on the type of LED source used, wavelength and irradiation parameters chosen.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A possible explanation for this is that cancer cells can have high susceptibility to visible light exposure, which leads to intracellular metabolic alterations. 20 Furthermore, visible LED irradiation can activate the p53 signaling pathway, thereby suppressing cancer cell proliferation. 20 These facts, however, can be highly dependent on the type of LED source used, wavelength and irradiation parameters chosen.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Furthermore, visible LED irradiation can activate the p53 signaling pathway, thereby suppressing cancer cell proliferation. 20 These facts, however, can be highly dependent on the type of LED source used, wavelength and irradiation parameters chosen. 20…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the irradiation dose increased (e.g., in the EB and EC groups), the concentration of ROS in the cells increased. In this case, protein crosslinking also occurred, and autolysis occurred in many muscle cells, which reduced the tightness of the muscle and made the PM more tender [25]. Until the 20th day, the shear force of the samples (LV group) was lower than that of the other groups (p < 0.05), implying that LVEF was able to induce an increase in the tenderness of PM.…”
Section: Whcmentioning
confidence: 97%