Supporting interdisciplinary case studies: development and implementation of a joint learning environment for students in forensic science and criminal law

Biedermann, Alex; Voisard, R.; Scoundrianos, Aurèle; Furrer, J.; Taroni, Franco; Champod, Christophe

doi:10.1080/00450618.2013.868926

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Such courses encourage students to break away from disciplinary norms and develop flexibility in their writing (and speaking) about science. Some universities also offer cross-disciplinary courses, which foster interaction between prospective forensic scientists and law students (Biedermann et al, 2014). Similar cross-disciplinary courses could be offered, for example, for students of climate and political sciences.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Discord in the Communication of Forensic Science

Howes

Kemp

2016

Journal of Language and Social Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The criminal justice system is one arena in which nonscientists use scientific findings and expert opinions to aid decision making. Forensic science is a standard feature of criminal investigations, out-of-court settlements, and trials. Yet forensic science may be poorly understood by those who use it as a decision aid, with a consequent risk of contributing to miscarriages of justice. In this article, we discuss some of the contentious aspects of communicating expert opinion, and consider how research suggests that scientists might balance the competing concerns of scientific correctness and comprehensibility for nonscientists. Highlighting both research and theory, we argue that modifying language is a necessary component of ensuring understanding. However, the aim of transferring knowledge from a forensic scientist to a nonscientist is a complex task. Language modification alone is not sufficient; the practices and processes of communication require consideration. We argue that the dialogue and participation models of communication have much to offer to foster understanding of forensic science and enhance its value in the criminal justice system. We acknowledge some practical challenges to dialogue and participation approaches, and provide an example of how innovative organisational practices can help to facilitate effective interprofessional communication.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%