Supply chain quality management

Mahdiraji, Hannan Amoozad; Arabzadeh, Meysam; Ghaffari, Reza

doi:10.5267/j.msl.2012.07.020

Cited by 25 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…On the other hand, environmental sustainability dimension, green supply chain management (GSCM) literature in particular, was observed to be the focal research line among the uni-dimensional The integration of quality management that seeks internal (executives and employees within boundaries of organisations) participation and supply chain management that seeks external (suppliers and customers) partnerships results in a synergistic, collaboration and coordination environment among all chain links with a holistic supply chain view (Vanichchinchai and Igel, 2009). As the ultimate goal of both QM and SCM is "customer satisfaction", the integration enhances the influence of both, resulting in enhanced organisational customer satisfaction levels (Mahdiraji et al, 2012). Through implementation of practices shared among QM and SCM such as continuous improvement and leadership, organisational performance is improved (Azar et al, 2010;Fernandes et al, 2017;Kaynak and Hartley, 2008).…”

Section: Descriptive Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Supply chain integration (increased supply chain collaboration) (Carmignani, 2009;Casadesús and de Castro, 2005;Chadha and Gagandeep, 2013;Chen et al, 2014;Flynn and Flynn, 2005;Fynes et al, 2005;Gu et al, 2017;Jiang et al, 2010;Kannan and Tan, 2005;Kaynak and Hartley, 2008;Kuei et al, 2011;Lou et al, 2009;Mahdiraji et al, 2012;Mellat-Parast, 2013;Quang et al, 2016;Robinson and Malhotra, 2005;Shalij et al, 2009;Sharma et al, 2012;Talib et al, 2011;Terziovski and Hermel, 2011;Vanichchinchai and Igel, 2009;Wang et al, 2010;Zhong et al, 2016) Improved customer satisfaction (Casadesús and de Castro, 2005;Chadha and Gagandeep, 2013;Fynes et al, 2005;Gu et al, 2017;Jiang et al, 2010;Kannan and Tan, 2005;Lin et al, 2013;Mahdiraji et al, 2012;Mellat-Parast, 2013;Quang et al, 2016;Robinson and Malhotra, 2005;Talib et al, 2011Talib et al, , 2010Vanichchinchai and Igel, 2009;Zeng et al, 2013) Improved firm performance (Azar et al, 2010;…”

Section: Benefit Authorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Sustainable supply chain quality management: A systematic review

Bastas

Liyanage

2018

Journal of Cleaner Production

217

129

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Maintaining profitability measures while conducting business through environmentally and socially sustainable operations is an optimization challenge for organizations globally and for our society. Aiming to contribute to the research streams on this global challenge, this paper studies the state of the art literature on two management methodologies along with sustainability management from an integration perspective: quality management with its intraorganizational focus and supply chain management with its interorganizational view. The paper establishes key themes, trends and new avenues for research through a structured systematic review. The systematic review undertaken includes both descriptive analysis and thematic synthesis of state of the art quality management, sustainability and supply chain management integration literature. Integration synergies of quality and supply chain management were established including performance improvements and integration increasing the effect of both methodologies. Incorporation of sustainability into quality and supply chain management was identified to be a highly emerging area with multi-dimensional (financial, ecologic and social) approaches highly in need for more sustainable supply chains. Ultimately, a new, emerging research area was revealed: sustainable supply chain quality management. Although, several reviews were conducted on the quality, supply chain and sustainability management practices, this study is one of the very few, undertaken from the perspective of all three approaches and cumulative integration. This contribution provides an initial theoretical framework to guide future theory building on a fruitful research avenue.

show abstract

Section: Descriptive Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Benefit Authorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainable supply chain quality management: A systematic review

Bastas

Liyanage

2018

Journal of Cleaner Production

217

129

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In industry 4.0, the market condition, various kinds of technological and manufacturing solutions, and selecting them is a challenge for investing, especially given to the difference in the advantages that each of them provides for the customer. For bringing balance to automation, attributes for assessing the strategy of implementing industry 4.0 are developed (Mahdiraji et al 2012;Mahdiraji et al, 2015;Saturno et al, 2017). Table 2 represents the attributes for assessing the strategies of implementing industry 4.0 quoted from the research literature (Erdogan et al, 2018;Sung, 2018).…”

Section: Theoretical Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating strategies for implementing industry 4.0: a hybrid expert oriented approach of BWM and interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy TODIM

Mahdiraji

Zavadskas

Škare

et al. 2020

Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Developing and accepting industry 4.0 influences the industry structure and customer willingness. To a successful transition to industry 4.0, implementation strategies should be selected with a systematic and comprehensive view to responding to the changes flexibly. This research aims to identify and prioritise the strategies for implementing industry 4.0. For this purpose, at first, evaluation attributes of strategies and also strategies to put industry 4.0 in practice are recognised. Then, the attributes are weighted to the experts' opinion by using the Best Worst Method (BWM). Subsequently, the strategies for implementing industry 4.0 in Fara-Sanat Company, as a case study, have been ranked based on the Interval Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy (IVIF) of the TODIM method. The results indicated that the attributes of 'Technology', 'Quality', and 'Operation' have respectively the highest importance. Furthermore, the strategies for "new business models development', 'Improving information systems' and 'Human resource management' received a higher rank. Eventually, some research and executive recommendations are provided. Having strategies for implementing industry 4.0 is a very important solution. Accordingly, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods are a useful tool for adopting and selecting appropriate strategies. In this research, a novel and hybrid combination of BWM-TODIM is presented under IVIF information.

show abstract

“…The balanced scorecard is a strategic planning and management system that aligns business activities with the organization's vision and strategy, improves internal and external communications, and controls the organization's performance against the strategic objectives . The balanced scorecard can be used as a communication tool, measurement system, and strategic management system (Ahn, 2001;Becker & Huselid, 2006;Jia, Mahdiraji, Govindan, & Meidutė, 2013;Mahdiraji, Arabzadeh, & Ghaffari, 2012;Malina & Selto, 2001;Niven, 2006;Rezaei, Jafari-Sadeghi, & Bresciani, 2020).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2020

JEMI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP, MANAGEMENT AND INNOVATION is an interdisciplinary, double blind-reviewed journal, emphasizing theoretical and empirical articles in entrepreneurship, management, innovation and related fields. The journal is published both in printed form and on-line at www.jemi.edu.pl. THE ENTREPRENEURSHIP AREA OF THE JOURNAL The entrepreneurship area of the journal covers the three major topics: 1) venture creation and small business, 2) the impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth including local and regional development, and 3) entrepreneurial attitudes and motives. We invite original papers of theoretical and empirical nature, rooted in the disciplines of economics, management, sociology, political science, and psychology. The interdisciplinary research is encouraged to assure a comprehensive approach to the topics discussed and to advance both theory and practice. THE MANAGEMENT AREA OF THE JOURNAL Management, as a thematic scope of the journal, focuses on theoretical and empirical considerations of various areas, such as: strategic management, operation or production management, human resource management, information and management, contemporary management problems, new methods and management tools, new forms of organization and management, new threats in management, or new challenges in the organization's environment. THE INNOVATION AREA OF THE JOURNAL The innovation area of the Journal's focus will emphasize a broad range of topics and approaches, including (but not limited to): 1) role of private and public sector in development and diffusion of innovations, 2) product, process and business model innovations, 3) profiles of innovative products, structures and processes, aimed at improving management practice and providing inspiration for entrepreneurs, 4) comparative analyses of national, regional policy or sector issues, such as R&D trends, patents, citations etc., 5) theoretical work on economic, organizational and scientific aspects of innovation, encouraging the search for inspirations from various disciplines, including natural sciences, arts and humanities. THE ENTREPRENEURIAL FINANCE AREA OF THE JOURNAL The entrepreneur or entrepreneurial firm, the institutions providing finance to the entrepreneurs, and the different types of financial sources used by the entrepreneurial firms or investors. Among the areas of our special interests might be enumerated: accounting and corporate finance, financial market as a background for SME development, entrepreneurial finance, regulatory and supervisory aspects related to corporate finance.

show abstract

Supply chain quality management

Cited by 25 publications

References 3 publications

Sustainable supply chain quality management: A systematic review

Sustainable supply chain quality management: A systematic review

Evaluating strategies for implementing industry 4.0: a hybrid expert oriented approach of BWM and interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy TODIM

Untitled

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About