Supplier selection in blood bags manufacturing industry using TOPSIS model

A fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approach to supply partner selection in continuous aid humanitarian supply chains

“…MCDM can help practitioners to appreciate the trade-offs, priority factors, multiple conflicting goals and supplier strengths and weaknesses, thereby improving humanitarian supplier selection decisions (Wang et al 2009;Shaw et al 2012;Bozorgi-Amiri et al 2013). Table 1 illustrates a broad range of MCDM techniques (Loken 2007;Venkatesh et al 2015).…”

EDAS ve WASPAS yöntemleriyle tıbbi malzeme tedarikçisi belirleme

“…Fiyat, teknik yeterlilik, hizmet kalitesi, tamir hizmeti ve garanti politikası [15] Ekonomik, çevresel ve sosyal [18] Kalite, fiyat, müşteri servisi, geçmiş deneyimi, dönüş hızı ve teslim süresi [19] Kalite, teslimat, teknoloji, imaj, çevre işleri, esneklik, bilgi sistemi, fiyat ve çevresel riskler [20] Fiyat, servis, teslimat, risk ve kalite [21] Satın alma fiyatı, kalite, tepki süresi, teslimatta güvenilirlik, son kullanma tarihi [22] Fiyat, kalite, zamanında teslimat, ödeme koşulları, tedarikçinin geçmişi, paketleme ve nakliye kalitesi [23] Atık yönetim maliyeti, tedarikçi ayrıntıları, atık işleme prosedürü, atık arıtma [24] Kalite, zamanında teslimat, güven, itibar, esneklik, önceki işbirliği deneyimi, mali durum, fiyat, teslim süresi, sağlanabilecek malzeme miktarı [25] Maliyet, tedarikçi durumu, teslim süresi, kalite [26] Fiyat ve maliyetler, kalite, tedarikçi profili, teslimat, esneklik [27] Satın alma maliyeti, ürün kalitesi, finansal istikrar, teslimat performansı, bina ve tesis, personel [92] Fiyat, teslimat, servis, esneklik ve ilişki [93] Maliyet, kalite, hizmetler, teslimat, tedarikçi profili [94] Maliyet, kalite, hizmetler, diğer, tedarikçi profili, risk [95] Kalite, maliyet, mevzuata uygunluk, hizmet güvenilirliği, risk yönetimi, tedarikçi profili, yeşil satın alma [96] Tedarik kapasitesi, üretim kapasitesi, tepki süresi, üretim teknolojisi, fiyat, garanti, prosedürel uygunluk, satın alma işlemi, iletişim sistemi, kalite, tamamlanan sevkiyat belgesi, miktar, zamanında teslimat, mali durum, yer, itibar, yönetim ve organizasyon [97] Tablo 3. Kriterlerin Tedarikçileri değerlendirmek için gerekli olan nihai kriter ağırlıklar, Tablo 5'de verilen sıralamalarda aynı indisli kriterlerin aritmetik ortalaması alınarak belirlenmiştir.…”

Assessment and Comparison of Various MCDM Approaches in the Selection of Manufacturing Process

“…Recent studies have concentrated on MCDM approaches, for example, fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy AHP for evaluation of supplier [3,[10][11][12]; fuzzy rule-based system (FRBS), fuzzy multicriteria decision-making (MCDM), stochastic MCDM, mathematical modelling, information theory, and heuristic approaches for evaluation of risks and failures of public transport systems [17], AHP for evaluation of waste treatment, supplier details, waste management cost, and waste handling procedure [18]; fuzzy AHP, quality function deployment (QFD) for evaluation of quality, cost, delivery time, and supplier standing [19]; multiattribute ideal-real comparative analysis (MAIRCA), best-worst method (BWM) for evaluation of flexibility, costs and price, profile of supplier, quality, and delivery [20]; fuzzy TOPSIS for evaluation of flexibility, delivery, reputation, quality, technology, and affairs of environment [21]; ANN and AHP for evaluation of service, cost, risk, delivery, and quality [22]; TOPSIS for evaluation of cost of purchasing, quality of product, stability of financial, delivery performance, facility and building, and personnel [23]; fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy AHP for evaluation of delivery, cost, service, relationship, and flexibility [24]; DEA for evaluation of price of purchasing, response time, quality, date of expiration, and reliability in delivery [25]; Z-TOPSIS, principal component analysis (PCA), and mixed integer linear programming for evaluation of quality, cost, delivery, profile of supplier, and services [26]; AHP for evaluation of cost, quality, regulatory compliance, reliability of service, management of risk, green purchasing, and profile of supplier [27]; fuzzy evaluation with MATLAB for environmental, social, and economic evaluation [28]; fuzzy VIKOR and artificial neural network for evaluation of quality, price, timely delivery, transporting and packaging quality, terms of payment, and the background of supplier [29]; Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment of Evaluations (PROMETHEE) Π and TOPSIS for evaluation of on-time delivery, quality, reliance, flexibility, reputation, status financial status, previous cooperation experience, price, amount of material can be provided, and duration of delivery time [30]; and multichoice goal programming (MCGP) and fuzzy TOPSIS for evaluation of capacity of supply, capacity of production, time of response, technology of production, warranty, price, procedural compliance, transaction of purchase, quality, communication system, completed shipping document, ontime delivery, financial position, reputation, location, organization, and management [31].…”