2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01436.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supplementary ultraviolet‐B irradiation reveals differences in stress responses between Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes*

Abstract: Irradiation of

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
32
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(62 reference statements)
5
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The intraecotypic differences reflect natural variation that is fixed in discrete genotypes because of the self-fertilizing nature of Arabidopsis (Breyne et al, 1999). Wassilewskija has previously been shown to contain altered red/ far-red responses and respond differently to stress than Columbia (Aukerman et al, 1997;Kalbina and Strid, 2006). This work highlights another difference as described by AS rates.…”
Section: Divergence In As Rates Within Speciesmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The intraecotypic differences reflect natural variation that is fixed in discrete genotypes because of the self-fertilizing nature of Arabidopsis (Breyne et al, 1999). Wassilewskija has previously been shown to contain altered red/ far-red responses and respond differently to stress than Columbia (Aukerman et al, 1997;Kalbina and Strid, 2006). This work highlights another difference as described by AS rates.…”
Section: Divergence In As Rates Within Speciesmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The minor diVerences in PSI polypeptide composition observed between psae1-3 and double mutant plants, in fact, would support this hypothesis. Alternatively, the diVerent stability of PSI in psae1-1 and -2 on one side, and psae1-3 on the other, could also be related to ecotype-speciWc diVerences in photosensitivity: both psae1-1 and -2 are in the Col-0 ecotype background (Varotto et al 2000), whereas psae1-3 is in the Ws background known to be more susceptible than other ecotypes to reactive oxygen species-induced damages (Kalbina and Strid 2006;Li et al 2006). Thus, the reduced amount of the E subunit could be more harmful to psae1-3 than to psae1-1 and -2 leaves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of consistent effects of UV-B radiation on some plant physiological characteristics may be due to differences in plant or ecotype responses (Kalbina and Strid 2006) or differences in UV-B dose or UV-B to PAR ratios (Fiscus and Booker 1995;Nogué s and Baker 1995;Allen et al 1998). Plants respond to low levels of UV-B as a signal through a UV-B specific signaling pathway (Kim et al 1998;Brown et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%