2012
DOI: 10.15232/s1080-7446(15)30361-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supplemental trace minerals (zinc, copper, manganese, and cobalt) as Availa-4 or inorganic sources for shipping-stressed beef cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in regard to trace-mineral supple-mentation from sulfate or organic sources, results have not been consistent. Kegley et al (2012) observed an increase in ADG and final BW over a 42-d backgrounding period in newly received calves supplemented with organic trace minerals versus calves supplemented with sulfate sources at levels identical to those fed in the current study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 48%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, in regard to trace-mineral supple-mentation from sulfate or organic sources, results have not been consistent. Kegley et al (2012) observed an increase in ADG and final BW over a 42-d backgrounding period in newly received calves supplemented with organic trace minerals versus calves supplemented with sulfate sources at levels identical to those fed in the current study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 48%
“…Thus, BVD type 1 antibody titer response alone cannot be used to describe trace-mineral source effect on vaccine response. Kegley et al (2012) reported no difference in BVD virus (which encompasses both BVD type 1 and 2), bovine respiratory syncytial virus, or bovine parainfluenza 3 after vaccination but did observe increases in infectious bovine rhinotracheitis virus antibody titers in calves supplemented with sulfate sources of Zn, Mn, Cu, and Co compared with those supplemented with amino-acid-complex sources of Zn, Mn, and Cu, and Co glucoheptonate. Because the current study did not examine any virus other than BVD type 1 titers, a direct comparison cannot be made.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All diets were isocaloric and isonitrogenous and formulated to meet requirements for energy, protein, macrominerals, Se, I, and vitamins (Table 1) of pregnant cows during the last trimester of gestation (NRC, 2000). The INR and AAC sources were mixed with the corn; formulated to provide the same daily amount of Cu, Co, Mn, and Zn (based on 7 g/cow daily of Availa 4; Siciliano-Jones et al, 2008;Kegley et al, 2012) as described in Table 1; and offered separately from hay in a different section of the same feed bunk. All diets (forage + concentrate) were limit fed at 10.8 kg of DM/cow daily, offered once daily (0700 h) from d 0 of the experiment until calving, and completely consumed within 6 h after feeding.…”
Section: Cow-calf Management and Dietary Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dorton et al (2006) supplemented Cu, Zn, Mn, and Co from 2 sources (sulfates or amino acid complexes) for 30 d of on-farm backgrounding and a 28 d feedlot receiving period, and they found no differences in morbidity or mortality rates. Ryan et al (2015) found no effects of source of trace mineral (Zn, Cu, and Mn from sulfates, organic amino acid complexes, or hydroxyl sources) on BW gain or morbidity during the receiving period; however, in a previous study Kegley et al (2012) observed a greater final weight in receiving cattle supplemented with organic amino acid complexes versus sulfates. Sharman et al (2008) compared trace minerals (Cu, Zn, and Mn) from sulfates and Co carbonate versus iso-amounts of Cu, Zn, Mn amino acid complexes and Co glucoheptonate and found no effect on growth performance or percentage morbidity.…”
Section: Role Of Trace Mineralsmentioning
confidence: 80%