2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supplemental nutrition assistance program and body weight outcomes: The role of economic contextual factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Longitudinal studies based on objectively measured outcomes are needed to strengthen the evidence base. Like cross-sectional studies, extant longitudinal research produced mixed results and most commonly measured healthy and unhealthy food availability solely as the number, density, or proximity of retail food outlets based on secondary data (Block et al, 2011; Boone-Heinonen et al, 2013; Gibson, 2011; Han et al, 2012; Li et al, 2009; Powell & Han, 2011). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longitudinal studies based on objectively measured outcomes are needed to strengthen the evidence base. Like cross-sectional studies, extant longitudinal research produced mixed results and most commonly measured healthy and unhealthy food availability solely as the number, density, or proximity of retail food outlets based on secondary data (Block et al, 2011; Boone-Heinonen et al, 2013; Gibson, 2011; Han et al, 2012; Li et al, 2009; Powell & Han, 2011). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Han et al [9] found that a large number of supermarkets and grocery stores in one’s zip code reduced the strength of the association between SNAP participation and BMI in a US representative sample. We used food environment indicators in the respondents’ census tract, which is a smaller geography than zip codes and therefore may better reflect neighborhood availability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used food environment indicators in the respondents’ census tract, which is a smaller geography than zip codes and therefore may better reflect neighborhood availability. In addition, we looked at a different dimension of the food environment than Han et al [9], focusing on the density of unhealthy food outlets instead of on supermarkets and grocery stores. Even though the majority of SNAP-participating households report using supermarkets as their main type of food store [22], most also report redeeming SNAP benefits in other stores [23, 24], with 42% using convenience stores [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14 Limited supermarket access, typically defined by physical proximity to the nearest supermarket or grocery store, 15 has been associated with overweight and obesity in many 16,17 but not all 15,18 studies. These discordant findings may arise because measures of neighborhood supermarket proximity may not capture actual supermarket access and use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%