Supplemental Laser for Eyes Treated with Bevacizumab Monotherapy in Severe Retinopathy of Prematurity

Gangwe

et al. 2021

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of combined intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) and zone I sparing laser ablation in infants with posterior zone I Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP). Methods: This was a retrospective, interventional case series including premature infants diagnosed with posterior zone I ROP ( n = 24) on ROP screening. Charts and RetCam images of preterm infants with posterior zone I ROP treated with immediate IVR and zone I sparing laser ablation at 4 weeks between April 2016 and September 2019 were reviewed. Data were analyzed and tabulated using frequency and descriptive statistics to describe the demography, morphology, and treatment outcomes. Primary outcome measure was structural outcome at 6 months. It was further categorized as favorable and unfavorable. Results: Twenty-four infants (48 eyes) with a mean gestational age of 28.54 ± 1.98 weeks and birth weight of 1180.33 ± 280.65 grams were analyzed. Thirty-six (75%) eyes had persistent tunica vasculosa lentis and twenty-six (54.1%) eyes had iris neovascularization. All eyes had features of aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity (APROP) limited to posterior zone I. The mean duration between IVR and zone I sparing laser ablation was 29.62 ± 6.36 (range: 24-34) days. One infant (2 eyes) received a second IVR treatment for recurrence of plus disease and persistent new vessels close to the fovea. Laser augmentation was done in 13 (27.1%) eyes. A favorable structural outcome was seen in 45 (93.7%) eyes. Conclusion: Posterior zone I ROP presents as APROP. Combined IVR and zone I sparing laser ablation appears effective treatment option in these eyes.

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Additionally, various studies reported reactivation of ROP ranging from 6.8% to 83% in eyes receiving anti-VEGF monotherapy for ROP. [ 10 11 12 13 ] There are also concerns regarding optimal dosage, duration of recurrence, systemic safety, proper follow-up protocol and long-term functional outcomes following anti-VEGF monotherapy.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Combined intravitreal ranibizumab and zone I sparing laser ablation in infants with posterior zone I retinopathy of prematurity

Parchand

Gangwe

et al. 2021

“…Though the safety of bilateral IVI in adults has been reported in retrospective studies involving thousands of procedures,[ 30 ] VRSI and AIOS guidelines for IVB do not recommend a bilateral injection on the same day. [ 29 ] ROP usually is bilaterally symmetrical in most cases and therefore injecting both eyes on the same day is logistically more convenient.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor in the management of retinopathy of prematurity: A survey among the members of Indian Retinopathy of Prematurity Society

Gangwe

Vinekar

et al. 2021

Purpose: To report the results of the survey for the role of anti-VEGF in the management of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) among the members of Indian ROP (iROP) society. Methods: A questionnaire was designed in English using Google forms and its link was circulated to the members of the iROP society on their mobile numbers. The survey included questions pertaining to demographics, anti-VEGF agents, injection technique, post-injection follow-up, and documentation pertaining to their ROP practice. Anonymous responses were obtained and analyzed for individual questions. Results: 226 members of the society were contacted and 157 responded (69.4%) to the survey. 137 (87.2%) respondents used anti-VEGF in the management of ROP. Aggressive posterior ROP (APROP) was the most common indication (78, 52.7%). The procedure was carried out in the main operation room (102, 70.3%) simultaneously for both the eyes (97; 68%) under topical anesthesia (134; 86.4%) by most of the respondents. One-hundred thirteen (77.9%) respondents used half of the adult dose, irrespective of the agent used; however, more than half of them preferred bevacizumab (85, 54%). 53 (36.3%) respondents followed up infants as per disease severity rather than a fixed schedule while only 33 (23%) performed photo documentation. 151 (96.2%) respondents felt the need for guidelines regarding the usage of anti-VEGF in ROP. Conclusion: There is an increase in the trend towards the use of anti-VEGF in the management of severe ROP, particularly APROP. However, there are considerable variations among the ROP practitioners regarding the agent, dosage, follow-up schedule, and documentation, suggesting the need for uniform guidelines.

“…[ 12 ] Similarly, outcomes of rescue laser after initial treatment with anti-VEGF therapy had also shown good results in APROP. [ 16 ]…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Outcomes of early versus deferred laser after intravitreal ranibizumab in aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity

Gangwe¹,

Gangrade³

et al. 2021

Purpose: The aim of this study was to report the treatment outcomes of early and deferred laser in infants of aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity (APROP) after initial treatment with intravitreal Ranibizumab (IVR). Methods: In a prospective, randomized, interventional study, infants with APROP received IVR (0.25 mg) and were randomized into two groups prior to laser. Laser was done at 1 week (group 1) or at 6 weeks or earlier if there was a recurrence of plus disease (group 2). The structural outcome, number of laser spots, duration of laser procedure and refractive error at 6 months were compared. Favorable structural outcome was defined as, complete regression of disease at 6 weeks after laser. Results: 63 eyes of 32 infants with APROP were enrolled. Mean gestational age (GA) and birth weight (BW) were 30.2 ± 2.3 weeks and 1294 ± 372.8 grams respectively. GA, BW, and disease severity were comparable at baseline. 27 (90%) eyes in group 1 and 29 (93.5%) eyes in group 2 had favorable structural outcome ( P = 0.61) at 6 weeks after laser. Eyes in group 2 (2149.8 ± 688.7) required lesser number of laser spots than group 1 (2570.8 ± 615) ( P = 0.01). At six months, more eyes in group 1 had myopic refractive error (Mean spherical equivalent: –1.0D ± 1.3) than those in group 2 (Mean spherical equivalent: 0.5D ± 1.9) ( P = 0.002). Conclusion: Infants with APROP receiving IVR have comparable structural outcomes after an early or deferred laser. Moreover, eyes undergoing deferred laser require less number of laser spots and have a less myopia at 6 months after laser.