2019
DOI: 10.1109/tnnls.2019.2893190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supervised Discriminative Sparse PCA for Com-Characteristic Gene Selection and Tumor Classification on Multiview Biological Data

Abstract: Principal component analysis (PCA) has been used to study the pathogenesis of diseases. To enhance the interpretability of classical PCA, various improved PCA methods have been proposed to date. Among these, a typical method is the so-called sparse PCA, which focuses on seeking sparse loadings. However, the performance of these methods is still far from satisfactory due to their limitation of using unsupervised learning methods; moreover, the class ambiguity within the sample is high. To overcome this problem,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, the MCBFS method was tested on eight benchmark tumor data sets and compared with seven benchmark supervised feature selection methods [ 34 ], including Chi Square, Fisher Score, Information Gain, mRMR, Gini Index, Kruskal Wallis and Relief-F. In addition, to further evaluate the performance of MCBFS, we compared it with six state-of-the-art supervised feature selection methods, including supervised discriminative sparse PCA (SDSPCA) [ 2 ], infinite latent feature selection (ILFS) [ 14 ], Double Kernel-Based Clustering method for Gene Selection (DKBCGS) [ 3 ], Infinite Feature Selection (infFS) [ 6 ], Supervised Multi-Cluster Feature Selection (SMCFS) [ 9 ] and Spectral Feature Selection (SPEC) [ 10 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this paper, the MCBFS method was tested on eight benchmark tumor data sets and compared with seven benchmark supervised feature selection methods [ 34 ], including Chi Square, Fisher Score, Information Gain, mRMR, Gini Index, Kruskal Wallis and Relief-F. In addition, to further evaluate the performance of MCBFS, we compared it with six state-of-the-art supervised feature selection methods, including supervised discriminative sparse PCA (SDSPCA) [ 2 ], infinite latent feature selection (ILFS) [ 14 ], Double Kernel-Based Clustering method for Gene Selection (DKBCGS) [ 3 ], Infinite Feature Selection (infFS) [ 6 ], Supervised Multi-Cluster Feature Selection (SMCFS) [ 9 ] and Spectral Feature Selection (SPEC) [ 10 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only a small subset of genes is suitable for tumor classification. To address these issues, some feature selection algorithms have recently been developed for identifying informative genes from genomic data of cancer [ 2 – 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A high-quality sampling approach has been proposed for imbalanced cancer samples for pre-diagnosis [9]. Supervised discriminative sparse principal component analysis (SDSPCA) has been used to study the pathogenesis of diseases and gene selection [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To efficiently preserve the local relations of the data and eliminate the negative effects of outliers in the PCA method, Zhou et al [23] proposed an improved sparse PCA method named robust sparse PCA. Feng et al [24] proposed a supervised discriminative sparse PCA (SDSPCA) method to study the pathogenesis of diseases, which incorporated discriminative information into the sparse PCA model. Then, Sun et al [25] presented a lateral-slice sparse tensor robust principal component analysis (LSSTRPCA) method to promote the performance of classification by removing gross errors or outliers from hyperspectral images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%