2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.94.207202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supersolids versus Phase Separation in Two-Dimensional Lattice Bosons

Abstract: We study the nature of the ground state of the two-dimensional extended boson Hubbard model on a square lattice by quantum Monte Carlo methods. We demonstrate that strong but finite on-site interaction U along with a comparable nearest-neighbor repulsion V result in a thermodynamically stable supersolid ground state for densities larger than 1/2, in contrast to fillings less than 1/2 or for very large U, where the checkerboard supersolid is unstable towards phase separation. We discuss the relevance of our res… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

22
317
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(344 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
22
317
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the SS phase appears above half filling. These properties agree with those obtained in a 2D QMC study with zt/U = 0.08 [31]. Figure 5(a) plots the result of perturbation 1 (dotdashed curve).…”
Section: A Half Fillingsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the SS phase appears above half filling. These properties agree with those obtained in a 2D QMC study with zt/U = 0.08 [31]. Figure 5(a) plots the result of perturbation 1 (dotdashed curve).…”
Section: A Half Fillingsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Therefore, they also agree almost exactly with the full numerical calculations except at large N . Figure 5(b) shows that PSs also appear above half filling but the region is very small compared to that obtained by 2D QMC [31]. The appearance of the PS(SS + S 2 ) phase and the intricate structure of the phase diagram are non-trivial; however, the two SS phases that sandwich the PS(SS + S 2 ) phase have different characteristics: one having a smaller zV/U resembles the SF phase and the other having a larger zV/U resembles the S 2 phase, as we will see below through δn = |N A − N B |.…”
Section: A Half Fillingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Thus, experiments with polar molecules go beyond quantum simulation of effective theories motivated by electronic systems and aim at exploring a genuinely new domain of many-body quantum behavior, unique to dipolar interactions. Dipolar interactions can be utilized to generate long-range interactions of arbitrary shape using microwave fields [11], simulate exotic spin Hamiltonians [12,13] and are theoretically predicted to give rise to numerous interesting collective phenomena such as roton softening [14][15][16], supersolidity [17][18][19][20][21], p-wave superfluidity [22], emergence of artificial photons [23], bilayer quantum phase transitions [24], multi-layer self-assembled chains [25] for bosonic molecules, dimerization and inter-layer pairing [26,27], spontaneous inter-layer coherence [28], itinerant ferroelectricity [29], anisotropic Fermi liquid theory and anisotropic sound modes [30][31][32][33], fractional quantum Hall effect [34], Wigner crystallization [35], density-wave and striped order [36,37], biaxial nematic phase [38], topological superfluidity [39] and Z 2 topological phase [40], just to mention a few.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the operator-loop cluster update, the autocorrelation time for the system sizes we consider here is at most a few Monte Carlo sweeps for the entire range of parameter space explored. The simulations are carried out on finite lattices with L 2 sites for L up to 32 at temperatures sufficiently low in order to resolve ground-state properties of this finite system [43]. Estimates of physical observables in the thermodynamic limit are obtained from simultaneous finite-size and finite-temperature extrapolation to the L → ∞, β → ∞ limit.…”
Section: Quantum Monte-carlomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In section II, we introduce the model, summarize the basic properties of the energy imbalanced honeycomb lattice, in particular the Berry curvature and we present the two approaches used in the paper: the quantum Monte-Carlo method (QMC) [40][41][42][43] and the Gutzwiller ansatz (GA) [44][45][46]. In section III, we present our numerical results: the ground state phase diagram and the excitations, emphasizing that they depict non-vanishing Berry curvature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%