2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2007.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superporous hydrogels for cartilage repair: Evaluation of the morphological and mechanical properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
78
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a higher number of freezing and thawing cycles, in spite of increasing nanoporosity, permeability studies suggest a complex relationship between crystallinity, pore interconnectivity, permeability and pore tortuosity that results in a decrease in permeability with the number of cycles [31].…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a higher number of freezing and thawing cycles, in spite of increasing nanoporosity, permeability studies suggest a complex relationship between crystallinity, pore interconnectivity, permeability and pore tortuosity that results in a decrease in permeability with the number of cycles [31].…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ESEM images show that both cartilage and PVA hydrogels are porous structures with small holes [31]. Water is retained within the polymer network due to the hydrophilic group of the polymer chains.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical properties of dry scaffold are not representative of the behavior of the material when immersed in cell culture media or during in vivo experiments, as the porous will be filled with aqueous media and/or growing tissue that will strongly contribute to the scaffold mechanical response. For dry scaffolds, the mechanical properties will depend mainly on the inner morphology, in particular, pore size and polymer wall thickness and interconnectivity 5 . On the other hand, when the scaffold is immersed in an aqueous media, there are other factors that contribute for scaffold mechanical behavior as well, such as hydrodynamics and permeability inside the porous structure 5,6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For dry scaffolds, the mechanical properties will depend mainly on the inner morphology, in particular, pore size and polymer wall thickness and interconnectivity 5 . On the other hand, when the scaffold is immersed in an aqueous media, there are other factors that contribute for scaffold mechanical behavior as well, such as hydrodynamics and permeability inside the porous structure 5,6 . Water is known for its low compressibility and any factor limiting water permeation through the material will increase apparent scaffold stiffness and therefore the influence of liquid media cannot be disregarded 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The properties of the dry scaffold are not representative of that of the scaffold with the pores filled by a growing tissue or simply by a fluid. In dry scaffolds, mechanical properties mainly depend on its inner morphology, in particular pore size, geometry and interconnectivity (Spiller et al, 2008). However, in the scaffold immersed in a liquid medium other factors can influence the mechanical properties as well, such as the hydrodynamics and permeability inside the scaffold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%