1986
DOI: 10.1143/jpsj.55.581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supernonlinear Shifts of Optical Energy Gaps in InSe and GaSe under Hydrostatic Pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
28
3

Year Published

1989
1989
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
8
28
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As was shown by Kuroda et al [9] the c-axis of JnSe exhibits a non-linear decreasing before the preasure attains 10 GPa. This is the cause of the sign change of the pressure coefficient of the lowest direct band from negative to positive a t 0.5 GPa.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As was shown by Kuroda et al [9] the c-axis of JnSe exhibits a non-linear decreasing before the preasure attains 10 GPa. This is the cause of the sign change of the pressure coefficient of the lowest direct band from negative to positive a t 0.5 GPa.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…4, all layers are assumed to be flat a t all x) and showed that the c-axis Identical signs and values of the first and the second exciton peak shifts in Li,GaSe, Na,GaSe, and NaJnSe give the possibility to assume that the exciton binding energy is almost invariable in intercalat,ed samples and to attribute the observed exciton shifts to the variation of the direct gap value. The shift of the energy gap of a semiconductor clue t o the strain effect can be evaluated from [9], (Oilc and Dl, deformation potentials across and along the layers, respectively, Aa/a fractional change of the a-axis). I n general, the a-axis in intercalated layered materials varies almost linearly [15, 171.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) At low pressures, the band structure calculations reproduce, at least qualitatively, the well-known change in sign [45] from negative to positive of the pressure coefficient of the lowest direct gap of ε -GaSe (labeled E Γ1 in Fig. 5); the sign change is related to a competition between interlayer and intralayer interactions, see Ref.…”
Section: Electronic Structure Of E-gase Under Pressurementioning
confidence: 57%
“…First, the electron effective mass is expected to increase at a slower rate than the band gap, as it is basically determined by higher energy direct allowed transitions with lower pressure coefficient [12,13]. Second, the sharp decrease of the slope starting at 3 GPa could be viewed as a signature of direct-indirect conduction band crossover that have been evidenced by intrinsic photoluminescence at room temperature, as electrons in the conduction band minimum at the Brillouin zone edge are expected to have a much higher effective mass [2].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%