2016
DOI: 10.17576/jskm-2016-1402-14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superior Temporal Gyrus (STG) and Cerebellum Show Different Activation Profile during Simple Arithmetic Addition Task in Quiet and in Noisy Environment: An fMRI Study

Abstract: Despite a vast number of studies that were focused on the roles of superior temporal gyrus (STG) and cerebellum as sensory area, little is known about their involvement in cognitive function such as attention and perception. The present fMRI study aimed to identify this cognitive role from brain activation profile of STG and cerebellum obtained from an arithmetic addition task. Eighteen healthy right hand dominance male adults participated in this study. They were instructed to solve single-digit addition task… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These were superior temporal gyrus (STG), Heschl’ s gyrus (HG), superior frontal gyrus (SFG), middle frontal gyrus (MFG), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). STG and HG are part of the primary auditory cortices (PAC) and were selected due to their dominant role in auditory processing [39, 40]. In addition, SFG, MFG, and IFG were chosen as they are part of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and are involved in working memory processing [41].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were superior temporal gyrus (STG), Heschl’ s gyrus (HG), superior frontal gyrus (SFG), middle frontal gyrus (MFG), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). STG and HG are part of the primary auditory cortices (PAC) and were selected due to their dominant role in auditory processing [39, 40]. In addition, SFG, MFG, and IFG were chosen as they are part of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and are involved in working memory processing [41].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the type of task, as well as on the conditions in which a given task is performed, different neural mechanisms might be invoked for disparate kinds of mental calculations (Curtis et al, 2016;Yusoff et al, 2016;Beller et al, 2018;Hickendorff et al, 2019). For example, complex addition or subtraction is based on mechanisms that are distinct from the ones for complex multiplication or division.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, school math calculation may engage different neural resources from those used in a store. Indeed, different complex calculations can be associated with disparate neural processes (Li et al, 2018), and therefore, can differentially/asymmetrically engage different subdivisions of the relevant neural circuits (Yusoff et al, 2016;Hawes et al, 2019). Thereby, one cannot assume that in the case of sale price calculations the role of the right SMG will be the same as in the case of multi-digit mental addition or subtraction (Montefinese et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant activation exhibited by IPL and ITG when the brain is at rest is evident from the present fMRI findings as indicated by SPM and GIFT analyses. Parietal and temporal gyrus in which IPL and ITG are located, are two main regions that are very much involved in interpreting senses as well as in the execution of higher cognitive function and perception Yusoff et al 2016). IPL and ITG activation (a) in resting brain reflects their additional function i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%