1972
Superficial Femoral Artery Catheterization
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
29
7
1
0
Citation Types
1
17
0
1
Year Published
1974
2025
Publication Types
Select...
30
3
1
Relationship
0
34
Authors
Journals
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
References 8 publications
1
17
0
1
“…Other experience confirms this [7,10,19,23,24] . In some cases studied, no decrease in limb blood flow was found to account for a shortened limb after catheterization [5,23] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Other experience confirms this [7,10,19,23,24] . In some cases studied, no decrease in limb blood flow was found to account for a shortened limb after catheterization [5,23] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Although generally well tolerated acutely, femoral artery occlusion can hinder the growth of the affected lower extremity. 18 , 19 In addition to techniques enabling crimping Optimus‐L stents to very low profiles, thin‐walled sheaths such as the GlideSheath Slender Sheath (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) or Halo One (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ) serve as valuable tools in reducing the risk of vascular complications. In our series, the advanced ultrathin‐wall technology of Terumo GlideSheath Slender facilitated successful in vivo implantation of Optimus‐L stents in an infant using a single 8 mm balloon and 6 Fr arterial access, as well as in a toddler and a school‐age child using two 10 mm balloons and 7 Fr arterial access each.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When longitudinal growth was affected, the circumference of the thigh and calf was also reduced. Others, using a tape measure, have reported a low incidence of leg-length discrepancy, however (21). The radiological technique is of course more accurate, but the radiation is obviously a disadvantage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
