2002
DOI: 10.1088/0953-2048/15/7/330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superconducting critical fields and anisotropy of a MgB2 single crystal

Abstract: Using a double axis vibrating sample magnetometer, we have made detailed magnetic measurements of the lower critical field Hc1 for fields parallel to the two crystallographic directions of MgB2 single crystals. Additionally, using a novel Hall probe magnetometer we have measured high precision magnetization loops, from which we directly determine the upper critical field Hc2 for both field orientations. Our results suggest that Hc1 is much larger than most previous estimates and that consequently the Ginzburg–… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
39
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6͑b͒ yielded to be ab (0)ϳ10 nm and c (0)ϳ3 nm. These values are similar to the previous results obtained from magnetic measurements on powder samples 27 or on single crystals [19][20][21][22][23] and the values determined from the calculation using the two band model, 28 but do not agree with the reported ␥-values determined from resistivity measurements on bulk samples [15][16][17][18]10,11,29 and c-axis-oriented films, [12][13][14] which are around 1.1 to 3, as shown in Table II.…”
Section: Anisotropy Of the Upper Critical Fieldsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…6͑b͒ yielded to be ab (0)ϳ10 nm and c (0)ϳ3 nm. These values are similar to the previous results obtained from magnetic measurements on powder samples 27 or on single crystals [19][20][21][22][23] and the values determined from the calculation using the two band model, 28 but do not agree with the reported ␥-values determined from resistivity measurements on bulk samples [15][16][17][18]10,11,29 and c-axis-oriented films, [12][13][14] which are around 1.1 to 3, as shown in Table II.…”
Section: Anisotropy Of the Upper Critical Fieldsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…As T decreases, the ratio H c2 || /H c2 ⊥ in both cases decreases, from ≈ 2 at T c down to ≈ 1.5 at 0 K. This behavior is opposite to the usual temperature dependence of H c2 (T) in MgB 2 single crystals for which the anisotropy parameter γ(T) = H c2 || /H c2 ⊥ typically increases from ≈ 3 at T c up to 5-6 at 0 K [8][9][10][11][12] . This unusual dependence of γ(T) for the dirty film is due to the large difference between σ and π electron diffusivities (D π ∼ 0.1D σ ).…”
Section: B) H C2 Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Equations (2) and (3) enable us to address the observed anomalous temperature dependence of the anisotropy of H c2 (θ) [8][9][10][11][12] , as described in detail elsewhere 36 . Here we only use the fact that for the parallel field orientation, H||ab, the effective diffusivities in Equations (2)- (4) …”
Section: Discussion A) Two-gap Dirty Limit Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned, for MgB 2 , the ratio (16) this is the magnetization in intermediate fields, M / ð 0 = 2 Þ lnðH c2 =HÞ, the main contribution to anisotropy comes from , however, the H c2 anisotropy contributes as well (being smoothed by the logarithm). The last situation should be taken into account while extracting anisotropy from the torque data in tilted fields, 25,26) the point stressed by Angst. 27) Given the simplifying assumptions about the Fermi surfaces we have made and our results for the H c2 anisotropy which reproduce qualitatively well the measured anisotropy, we believe that the anisotropic properties of H c2 and we have described, are generic for materials with anisotropic gaps and Fermi surfaces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%