1985
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(85)80509-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sunshine exposure and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in exclusively breast-fed infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
119
0
10

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
119
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…[8] A study that included black and white infants estimated that most breastfed infants need to be exposed to sunlight for at least 30 minutes/week while wearing only a nappy in order to maintain 25(OH)D levels at >20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L). [9] This amount of sun exposure is unlikely, given current recommendations to limit sun exposure in infants <6 months old.…”
Section: Vitamin D Metabolismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8] A study that included black and white infants estimated that most breastfed infants need to be exposed to sunlight for at least 30 minutes/week while wearing only a nappy in order to maintain 25(OH)D levels at >20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L). [9] This amount of sun exposure is unlikely, given current recommendations to limit sun exposure in infants <6 months old.…”
Section: Vitamin D Metabolismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breast milk is indisputably the ideal food for infants; however, breast milk typically contains about 25 IU/L which is insufficient for rickets prevention. 15,16 Although there is evidence that limited sun exposure may prevent rickets in some breast-fed infants concerns over the health risk of sun exposure had led to the recommendation that all breast-fed infants receive supplemental vitamin D. 17,18 Thacher et al reported that children with rickets had a greater proportion of first degree relatives with a history of rickets. 19 A similar diet and environment may be the reason for rickets in families.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was a significant increase in 25(OH)D from winter to summer, but this did not adequately explain the age-related rise in infant 25(OH)D. The strong correlation between age and calendar day in the present study (due to births of enrolled infants occurring during only part of the calendar year), however, limited our ability to fully separate the effects of age and season. Specker et al attributed the age-associated rise in 25(OH)D to higher UV exposure in older infants (32) . Although deliberately exposing infants to sunlight, a custom that is often practised in South Asia (33,34) , may have contributed to cutaneous synthesis of vitamin D, self-reported sun exposure-related practices explained little variance in infant 25(OH)D in age-adjusted analyses in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%