1994
DOI: 10.1016/0167-8140(94)90444-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successful treatment of radiation-induced fibrosis using liposomal superoxide dismutase: clinical trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
96
0
7

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 217 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
96
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Intramuscular injections of liposomal Cu/Zn-SOD on 34 patients with palpable RT induced fibrosis, showed some clinical regression of fibrosis, with complete response in 17% of fibrotic areas [39]. Another study using liposomal Cu/Zn-SOD and Mn-SOD in pigs with subcutaneous RT fibrosis also demonstrated regression of fibrotic areas [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Intramuscular injections of liposomal Cu/Zn-SOD on 34 patients with palpable RT induced fibrosis, showed some clinical regression of fibrosis, with complete response in 17% of fibrotic areas [39]. Another study using liposomal Cu/Zn-SOD and Mn-SOD in pigs with subcutaneous RT fibrosis also demonstrated regression of fibrotic areas [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There is a growing body of evidences that SOD could be a potential antifibrotic drug, as proved by clinical results on radiation-induced fibrosis [54,55] and its therapeutic effect could be related to a down-regulation of TGF-β1 expression and activity [27,56]. Superoxide dismutases exhibit potent anti-inflammatory properties [57], and all isoforms (SOD1, SOD2, and SOD3) induced 70% regression of a well-established fibrotic tissue and its replacement by regenerated normal tissue [54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pharmacologic interventions and biologic response modifiers have recently been focused on pulmonary radiation protection. Intravenous or systemic delivery of compounds such as WR2721 (Amifostine), [9][10][11][26][27][28][29]32 colony stimulating factors, 31 or other antioxidant molecules 30,33,34 has the potential problem of distribution to tumor vasculature within the target volume. 27,29 Simultaneous tumor and normal tissue radiation protection would not alter the therapeutic ratio or shift to a desirable effect of normal tissue radiation protection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%