2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00431-004-1519-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subterminal deletion/duplication event in an affected male due to maternal X chromosome pericentric inversion

Abstract: Fluorescent in situ hybridisation techniques using subtelomeric DNA probes are essential tools for detection of such complex submicroscopic chromosomal rearrangements as the dup/del event of the X chromosome described in our patient.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, at least five patients (Table IB) are reported in the literature with gross rearrangements involving Xp22, who did not present with features of CDPX1 despite a proven deletion of ARSE [de Vries et al, 1999; Seidel et al, 2001; Boycott et al, 2003; Kokalj‐Vokac et al, 2004]. In these cases deletion of ARSE was an incidental finding on cytogenetic analysis, which was performed because the complex phenotype of the patients was suggestive of a genomic alteration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, at least five patients (Table IB) are reported in the literature with gross rearrangements involving Xp22, who did not present with features of CDPX1 despite a proven deletion of ARSE [de Vries et al, 1999; Seidel et al, 2001; Boycott et al, 2003; Kokalj‐Vokac et al, 2004]. In these cases deletion of ARSE was an incidental finding on cytogenetic analysis, which was performed because the complex phenotype of the patients was suggestive of a genomic alteration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These cases are presumed to be the result of either a recombination event in a parent carrying a pericentric inversion [23][24][25][26][27] or inherited from a phenotypically normal mother carrying the abnormal X. 28 We report two additional cases in which an Xq duplication encompassing MECP2 was accompanied by an Xp deletion, resulting from a specific intrachromosomal rearrangement in which the duplicated segment of Xq was translocated to the Xp22.3 band.…”
Section: Xp-xq Rearrangementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pregnancy was complicated by influenza associated with dehydration. Literature (n¼5) [21][22][23] Literature (n¼8) [25][26][27][28] …”
Section: Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the breakpoints are flanked by repeated sequences, an intramolecular recombination between them could occur during spermatogenesis [22]. Otherwise, the rearrangement could be generated by a recombination event between an X chromosome with a pericentric inversion and the normal homolog during female meiosis [6, 23]. In this family, we defined the breakpoints through FISH and array-CGH analyses and homologous repeated sequences were not present in these regions, making the pericentric inversion the most likely promoting mechanism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%