2013
DOI: 10.3354/meps10376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substrate as a driver of sponge distributions in mangrove ecosystems

Abstract: Caribbean mangrove-associated sponge communities are very distinct from sponge communities living on nearby reefs, but the mechanisms that underlie this distinction remain uncertain. This study aimed to elucidate the relative importance of substrate and habitat in determining the ability of sponges to persist in mangrove ecosystems, and to evaluate the role of bacterial symbiont composition and carbon uptake in sponge distribution. Two reef species (Aplysina archeri and Desmapsamma anchorata) were transplanted… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(34 reference statements)
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, 60% of the specimens transplanted to substrates containing mangrove DOM showed substantial (40-100% of the tissue) necrosis (white lesions) after 1 week ( Figure 1D), suggesting that mangrove DOM significantly affected the performance of D. anchorata (two-sample z-test, z = 2.1, p = 0.0384). This response is in agreement with previous observations on reef sponges transplanted to mangrove roots Wulff 2004;Pawlik et al 2007;Hunting et al 2013). The mangrove sponge T. ignis did not reveal any sign of necrosis on substrates containing mangrove DOM or on the control substrates ( Figure 1B,D).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, 60% of the specimens transplanted to substrates containing mangrove DOM showed substantial (40-100% of the tissue) necrosis (white lesions) after 1 week ( Figure 1D), suggesting that mangrove DOM significantly affected the performance of D. anchorata (two-sample z-test, z = 2.1, p = 0.0384). This response is in agreement with previous observations on reef sponges transplanted to mangrove roots Wulff 2004;Pawlik et al 2007;Hunting et al 2013). The mangrove sponge T. ignis did not reveal any sign of necrosis on substrates containing mangrove DOM or on the control substrates ( Figure 1B,D).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Mangrove DOM consists mainly of tannins and polyphenolic compounds (Maie and Jaffe 2006), which are structurally complex and recalcitrant to biodegradation (Field and Lettinga 1992;Koch et al 2005;Kristensen et al 2008), thereby reducing mangrove palatability and inhibiting growth of fouling organisms on mangrove roots (e.g., Schmitt et al 1998). A limited number of bacterial and fungal species are able to degrade complex polyphenols and tannins (Bhat et al 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sunlight is known to impair microorganisms through detrimental effects on DNA and extracellular enzymes (e.g. Santos et al 2013), in which indirect effects of sunlight can also affect OM-associated microbial communities via photo-oxidation of OM and its degradation into smaller palatable or harmful molecules depending on OM substrate (Mopper and Zhou 1990, Scully et al 1996, Obernosterer and Benner 2004, Albarino et al 2008, Hunting et al 2013b. Adverse effects of shorter wavelengths (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…recalcitrant substrates nor specific substrates typical of the plant leaves used in this study. It is thus impossible to directly relate the carbon substrates utilization to actual microbial density and community structure, as well as their relative metabolic activity and how they would function under natural conditions, yet the number of utilized substrates offers a proxy of the metabolic or functional diversity of a microbial community (Hunting et al 2013b, Zhai et al 2016, or the resource breadth utilized by the bacterial community (Hunting et al 2015(Hunting et al , 2017. Plates were incubated for 96 h at 18°C and absorbance was measured at 590 nm using a BIO-RAD SmartSpec ™ Plus spectrophotometer.…”
Section: Experiments 1: Effects Of Sunlight On Om Degradation and Om-amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore impossible to directly relate substrate utilization profiles to the actual functioning of the developed bacterial communities. Nonetheless, the number of substrates used can serve as a proxy of the metabolic diversity of the bacterial community, and differences in utilization profiles indicate that functionally distinct bacterial communities can develop depending on treatment (Garland, 1999; Hunting et al, 2013a). At the end of the experiment (day 5), 1 mL of the sediment top layer with minimal water was sampled with a pipette, diluted 30× with DSW and vortexed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%