2019
DOI: 10.1161/circgen.119.002470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subsequent Event Risk in Individuals With Established Coronary Heart Disease

Abstract: Background: The Genetics of Subsequent Coronary Heart Disease (GENIUS-CHD) consortium was established to facilitate discovery and validation of genetic variants and biomarkers for risk of subsequent CHD events, in individuals with established CHD. Methods: The consortium currently includes 57 studies from 18 countries, recruiting 185 614 participants with either acute coronary syndrome, stable CHD, or a mixture of both at baseline. All studies collected… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings imply that genetic prediction of subsequent coronary disease events is likely to require dedicated GWAS of coronary disease progression. Second, our findings contribute to the existing literature (13, 31, 32, 39, 40) emphasising the caution required when using genetic data to infer causality in the context of disease progression. Genetic associations are generally thought to be causal by analogy with Mendelian randomization (41) because of the reduced possibility of confounding and reverse causation, but the observed protective associations of CAD PRS with mortality and ischemic stroke suggest that this may not hold for case-only studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings imply that genetic prediction of subsequent coronary disease events is likely to require dedicated GWAS of coronary disease progression. Second, our findings contribute to the existing literature (13, 31, 32, 39, 40) emphasising the caution required when using genetic data to infer causality in the context of disease progression. Genetic associations are generally thought to be causal by analogy with Mendelian randomization (41) because of the reduced possibility of confounding and reverse causation, but the observed protective associations of CAD PRS with mortality and ischemic stroke suggest that this may not hold for case-only studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…This may be due to index event bias, although other possibilities need to be explored. Future work, such as dedicated GWAS of disease progression, by initiatives such as the GENIUS-CHD consortium (40) will aim to further explore genetic differences between onset and progression of CAD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vast majority of studies examining the genetic contribution to the risk of secondary events in those with established coronary artery disease have been in European populations, with the largest being the GENIUS-CHD consortium involving over 185,000 participants [37,38]. However, there are far fewer studies of non-European populations who are at particularly high risk [39,40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the Genetics of Subsequent Coronary Heart Disease consortium (GENIUS-CHD) was established to discover and validate genetic variants and biomarkers for the risk assessment of subsequent ischemic events along with novel drug targets for secondary prevention. It is considered a first-class initiative able to generate extraordinary results also in the field of sex-oriented cardiology [53]. Our group has contributed for a long time to the disclosure of the genetics/pharmacogenetics bases of myocardial infarction [54][55][56][57][58][59], and very recently we summarized our previous efforts and patents [US2016363592 (A1); ITTO20130532 (A1)] in a Special Issue belonging to the "Novel Molecular Targets for Cardioprotection: The EU-Cardioprotection Cost Action (CA16225)", which suggest useful sex-oriented prognostic biomarkers [60].…”
Section: Sex Disparity In Cardiovascular Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%