Studying the Neural Basis of Adaptive Locomotor Behavior in Insects

Abstract

Studying the neural basis of walking behavior, one often faces the problem that it is hard to separate the neuronally produced stepping output from those leg movements that result from passive forces and interactions with other legs through the common contact with the substrate. If we want to understand, which part of a given movement is produced by nervous system motor output, kinematic analysis of stepping movements, therefore, needs to be complemented with electrophysiological recordings of motor activity. The recording of neuronal or muscular activity in a behaving animal is often limited by the electrophysiological equipment which can constrain the animal in its ability to move with as many degrees of freedom as possible. This can either be avoided by using implantable electrodes and then having the animal move on a long tether (i.e. Clarac et al., 1987;Duch & Pflüger, 1995;Böhm et al., 1997;Gruhn & Rathmayer, 2002) or by transmitting the data using telemetric devices (Kutsch et al, 1993;Fischer et al., 1996;Tsuchida et al. 2004;Hama et al., 2007;Wang et al., 2008). Both of these elegant methods, which are successfully used in larger arthropods, often prove difficult to apply in smaller walking insects which either easily get entangled in the long tether or are hindered by the weight of the telemetric device and its batteries. In addition, in all these cases, it is still impossible to distinguish between the purely neuronal basis of locomotion and the effects exerted by mechanical coupling between the walking legs through the substrate. One solution for this problem is to conduct the experiments in a tethered animal that is free to walk in place and that is locally suspended, for example over a slippery surface, which effectively removes most ground contact mechanics. This has been used to study escape responses (Camhi and Nolen, 1981;Camhi and Levy, 1988), turning (Tryba and Ritzman, 2000a,b;Gruhn et al., 2009a), backward walking (Graham and Epstein, 1985) or changes in velocity (Gruhn et al., 2009b) and it allows the experimenter easily to combine intra-and extracellular physiology with kinematic analyses (Gruhn et al., 2006).We use a slippery surface setup to investigate the timing of leg muscles in the behaving stick insect with respect to touch-down and lift-off under different behavioral paradigms such as straight forward and curved walking in intact and reduced preparations. Video LinkThe video component of this article can be found at https://www.jove.com/video/2629/ Protocol The Walking SurfaceThe black walking surface is made up of two nickel coated brass plates permanently joined side by side and electrically insulated from one another by a 2mm wide strip of 2-component epoxy glue (UHU plus, UHU GmbH, Germany) directly underneath the longitudinal axis of the animal. They produce a total surface area of 13.5x15.5cm (Figure 1). The separation of the half-planes for left and right legs allows independent tarsal contact monitoring for a single leg on each side.1. The plate is lubricated wit...

Control of reflex reversal in stick insect walking: effects of intersegmental signals, changes in direction, and optomotor-induced turning

“…During the stance phase, movement of a middle leg on the inner side of the curve is directed toward the body of the animal, as if pulling the animal via flexion of the FTi-joint toward the side of the turn. In contrast, a middle leg on the outer side pushes backward along the length axis of the animal (Gruhn et al 2009(Gruhn et al , 2011. We studied whether the occurrence of reflex reversals differed in the two middle legs during optomotor stimulation, which induces turning in direction similar to walking in a curve (Gruhn et al 2006).…”

“…To elicit curve walking in the stick insects, the stripes on both screens moved to either the right or left, which elicited the respective walking direction ( Fig. 1; Gruhn et al 2011).…”

The Influence of the Microbiome on Type 1 Diabetes

“…Certain high-risk HLA haplotypes are shared between celiac disease and T1D patients (45). The German BABYDIET cohort was initiated to investigate whether delayed exposure to dietary gluten could delay development of b-cell autoantibodies (46). Although no protective effect was found, a longitudinal analysis of the gut microbiota of 22 autoantibody-positive and 22 autoantibody-negative BABYDIET study children revealed altered bacterial interaction networks at the ages of 6 and 24 mo (47).…”

A neuromechanical model explaining forward and backward stepping in the stick insect

“…10. Switching from forward to backward walking in the experiment (A) [adapted from Gruhn et al (2011) with permission] and in the model (B). Traces are as indicated in A.…”