1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2787(1997)16:1<1::aid-mas1>3.0.co;2-l
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
Studying noncovalent protein complexes by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry
Abstract: Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry has been used to baggage carriers, providing transport to important destinastudy protein interactions driven by noncovalent forces. The tions. In other cases, proteins require a partner to fulfill gentleness of the electrospray ionization process allows intact their crucial task in life. Generally, proteins as a class are protein complexes to be directly detected by mass spectrometry.nondiscriminating, interacting with a variety of species, Evidence from the growing bo…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
990
116
44
14
Citation Types
8
470
0
5
Year Published
1972
2026
Publication Types
Select...
1,029
62
33
8
Relationship
30
1,102
Authors
Journals
Cited by 1,132 publications
(483 citation statements)
References 156 publications
8
470
0
5
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…We note that the distribution of these probability values does not show any correlation with the affinity of the peptide ligand for its protein target but, instead, shows a clear correlation with the nature of the peptide (Supplementary Figure S7). This is in agreement with the conclusion from another study on protein–peptide interactions [23]. Gathering the results from [13] (which, apart one case among six, did not bear on protein–peptide interaction) also revealed a complete lack of correlation between and P (not shown).…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 91%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…We note that the distribution of these probability values does not show any correlation with the affinity of the peptide ligand for its protein target but, instead, shows a clear correlation with the nature of the peptide (Supplementary Figure S7). This is in agreement with the conclusion from another study on protein–peptide interactions [23]. Gathering the results from [13] (which, apart one case among six, did not bear on protein–peptide interaction) also revealed a complete lack of correlation between and P (not shown).…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 91%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This observation supports the notion that the charge state of the detected protein ions does not profoundly influence the retention of native interactions (in the absence of overt changes to the detected cross sections), , which is expected until the point that the added protons are close enough to interact or disrupt salt bridges. Hence, overall, our observations support previous literature ,,,,− that proposes that significant structural reorganization of the native polypeptide chains of protein complexes is unlikely during native IM/MS measurements, except for flexible regions such as termini or loops.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Taken together, the fraction of native contacts calculated for the structures predicted by the SRA method highlights strong retention of the overall protein complexes and confirms notions made in prior literature in this regard. ,− Further, the SRA supports prior reports , that the charge states observed under native IM/MS measurements for the same protein complex exert only a negligible impact on the retention of native contacts. Finally, the dominant binding interfaces between polypeptide chains in the complexes studied here appear retained largely to the same extent as native contacts within the polypeptide chains.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 87%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Despite the very high affinity of the E9 DNase‐Im9 complex observed in solution, in the gas‐phase disruption of the protein–protein interaction occurs before dissociation of the protein–metal ion interaction. This is in accordance with the emerging view that electrostatic interactions are enhanced, whereas the hydrophobic effect becomes less significant in the gas phase (Loo 1997; Smith et al 1997a,b).…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 90%
