2019
DOI: 10.1080/01490451.2019.1705437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study the grain size and infiltration method effects for sand soil improvement using the microbial method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The test results based on a series of drained triaxial tests proved that the stress-strain behavior of biotreated sands could be influenced by the biotreatment level and p c (Feng and Montoya 2016;Lin et al 2016a;Gao et al 2019a;Liu et al 2019a;Nafisi et al 2019;Cui et al 2021a;Wu et al 2021). In addition, extensive direct shear tests have been performed to evaluate the shear resistance of biotreated soils along a given plane (Azadi et al 2017;Gui et al 2018;Hataf and Jamali 2018;Pakbaz et al 2018;Zamani and Montoya 2018;Amini Kiasari et al 2019;Khaleghi and Rowshanzamir 2019;Saquib Wani and Mir 2019;Cheshomi and Mansouri 2020;Pakbaz et al 2020;Riveros and Sadrekarimi 2020a). Based on the representative stress-horizontal displacement and vertical displacement-horizontal displacement curves for biotreated sands in direct shear tests that were conducted by Pakbaz et al (2018), the biotreatment could result in a significant strain softening, and the shear stress of biotreated sands at a given vertical stress was higher than that of their untreated counterparts.…”
Section: Compression and Shear Strength Of Biotreated Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test results based on a series of drained triaxial tests proved that the stress-strain behavior of biotreated sands could be influenced by the biotreatment level and p c (Feng and Montoya 2016;Lin et al 2016a;Gao et al 2019a;Liu et al 2019a;Nafisi et al 2019;Cui et al 2021a;Wu et al 2021). In addition, extensive direct shear tests have been performed to evaluate the shear resistance of biotreated soils along a given plane (Azadi et al 2017;Gui et al 2018;Hataf and Jamali 2018;Pakbaz et al 2018;Zamani and Montoya 2018;Amini Kiasari et al 2019;Khaleghi and Rowshanzamir 2019;Saquib Wani and Mir 2019;Cheshomi and Mansouri 2020;Pakbaz et al 2020;Riveros and Sadrekarimi 2020a). Based on the representative stress-horizontal displacement and vertical displacement-horizontal displacement curves for biotreated sands in direct shear tests that were conducted by Pakbaz et al (2018), the biotreatment could result in a significant strain softening, and the shear stress of biotreated sands at a given vertical stress was higher than that of their untreated counterparts.…”
Section: Compression and Shear Strength Of Biotreated Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amarakoon et al [23] found that the best range of average particle size of sand is 0.6mm~1.2mm, in the sand with average diameter of 0.2mm, because bacteria can not completely catalyze urea hydrolysis, the output of calcium carbonate is the least, and the strength is the lowest, only 1.4MPa. In addition, the change of particle size also affects the cohesion, internal friction angle and shear strength of sand, with the increase of sand particle size, the cohesion of reinforced sand sample is no longer zero, and the internal friction angle increases slightly, and the shear strength increases exponentially [24].…”
Section: Particle Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…MICP technology is used to conduct rock and soil plugging experiments [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43], it can be seen that the microbial mineralization technology can form an effective plug, this method makes the geotechnical engineering be strengthened and seepage prevention, guaranteed its stability and durability. The particle size, particle size gradation and relative density of soil are important factors that determine the effect of soil solidi cation, the academic community has carried out soil column cementation experiments for soils of various particle sizes including kaolin, silt, ne sand, coarse sand and gravel [44][45][46][47][48][49][50], the particle size range of effective cementation is obtained, through the measurement of samples with different particle size gradations [51][52][53][54][55], it is found that the sand with coarser grains and good gradation has better curing effect after the improvement of MICP technology, the relationship between the relative density of the soil and the cementation strength was studied [56-61], and it was found that the cementation strength of the soil was positively correlated with its relative density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%