2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2020.02.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of wall-to-bed heat transfer in circulating fluidized bed riser based on CFD simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the model can be selected for use in further CFB Boiler research. The validation process is carried out by comparing the pressure drop value in the furnace from a height of 0 -30 m. Figure 5 illustrates the comparison of the pressure distribution values between the simulation results and three turbulence models as well as experiments and simulations by Zhang et al, The error value obtained from the pressure drop is 6.59% with the standard 𝑘 − 𝜀 model, 6.24% with the RNG 𝑘 − 𝜀 model, and 6.36% with the RSM, indicating that the maximum permitted error limit of 10% has been met [28]. In addition, the error values from the simulations of Zhang et al, to the experimental data is 8.55% by the RNG 𝑘 − 𝜀 turbulence model, which makes this model have the most minor error value in this study.…”
Section: Validation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the model can be selected for use in further CFB Boiler research. The validation process is carried out by comparing the pressure drop value in the furnace from a height of 0 -30 m. Figure 5 illustrates the comparison of the pressure distribution values between the simulation results and three turbulence models as well as experiments and simulations by Zhang et al, The error value obtained from the pressure drop is 6.59% with the standard 𝑘 − 𝜀 model, 6.24% with the RNG 𝑘 − 𝜀 model, and 6.36% with the RSM, indicating that the maximum permitted error limit of 10% has been met [28]. In addition, the error values from the simulations of Zhang et al, to the experimental data is 8.55% by the RNG 𝑘 − 𝜀 turbulence model, which makes this model have the most minor error value in this study.…”
Section: Validation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…4 contains specific information regarding the properties of the granular phase materials. A two-phase flow model with granular kinetic flow theory was used to predict hydrodynamic phenomena [28]. The value of boundary condition is adjusted to the simulation data of Zhang et al, in order to obtain accurate value that are close to the experimental data [24].…”
Section: Simulation Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Eulerian–Eulerian two-fluid model (TFM) was applied to the gas–solid flow system in which both the gas and catalyst particles were regarded as the interpenetrating fluid. , The fluid dynamic properties of solid particles were calculated based on the kinetic theory of granular flow (KTGF) . The relevant expressions of conservation equations about mass, momentum, drag model, and turbulence are shown in Table . − For governing equations, the subscripts “g” and “s” represent the gas phase and solid phase, respectively.…”
Section: Computational Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two approaches are the effective methods that currently used to predict gas-solid multiphase ow behaviors coupled with chemical reaction, heat and mass transfer. [34][35][36][37][38][39][40] However, the latter is widely used due to its simplicity and relatively low computational cost. In addition, several researchers applied the CFD approach to simulate FCC in uidized bed reactors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational uid dynamics (CFD) is the effective tool to simulate gas-solid ow systems in recent years. 23,24 CFD offers a qualitative and quantitative prediction of the performance of uid ows via mathematical modeling, numerical methods, and soware tools. 25 Using existing experimental data from the literature, [26][27][28][29] the accuracy of the CFD model prediction of ow behavior in multiphase ow reactors has been statistically conrmed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%