2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2014.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of surface subsidence above an underground opening using a trap door apparatus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although numerical modelling techniques have undergone significant improvements since they were invented a few decades ago, physical modelling techniques and the monitoring devices in mining-related studies have not been significantly improved from the early models (Table 1). Only recently, a few examples of utilizing newer technologies, such as laser based measuring devices, infrared and acoustic measurement have been reported in the literature [16,[21][22][23]. It is now considered advantageous to employ some of these new measurement techniques and provide researchers with a practical and yet easy to use systematic approach for putting together the best possible combination of new and old measuring technologies for physical modelling of mining related problems.…”
Section: Improved Data Acquisition and Measurement Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although numerical modelling techniques have undergone significant improvements since they were invented a few decades ago, physical modelling techniques and the monitoring devices in mining-related studies have not been significantly improved from the early models (Table 1). Only recently, a few examples of utilizing newer technologies, such as laser based measuring devices, infrared and acoustic measurement have been reported in the literature [16,[21][22][23]. It is now considered advantageous to employ some of these new measurement techniques and provide researchers with a practical and yet easy to use systematic approach for putting together the best possible combination of new and old measuring technologies for physical modelling of mining related problems.…”
Section: Improved Data Acquisition and Measurement Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solving such a system of elements with multiple degrees of freedom is very difficult using classical methods from mechanics, but results can be obtained with other methods. In practical terms, the stochastic model is also limited to the behavior of the undermined rock mass or soil bound to the observation area and in some cases requires verification with physical laboratory models [28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, subsidence prediction in single-seam mining mainly uses empirical methods, numerical modeling methods (e.g., finite element methods, finite difference methods, discrete element methods), physical modeling methods, and theoretical analysis methods (e.g., influence function methods, profile function methods) [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jung et al [14] selected propensity and dip as two important considerations and used a settlement sensitivity prediction method to predict the ground subsidence of coal mines with complex conditions and irregular shape. Thongprapha et al [16] used a physical model to simulate the effects of underground cavern excavation on surface subsidence under supercritical conditions and concluded that the geometry of underground caverns is the main factor controlling land subsidence. Current research used conventional methods to study the subsidence and its effect factors, including depth, shape, exploitation method and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%