Study of metal-organic framework MIL-101(Cr) for natural gas (methane) storage and compare with other MOFs (metal-organic frameworks)

Kayal, Sibnath; Sun, Baichuan; Chakraborty, Anutosh

doi:10.1016/j.energy.2015.08.096

Cited by 140 publications

(79 citation statements)

References 63 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In view of this important goal, it is necessary to take into account evaluation of the CH 4 storage capacity, which should reach a target of 150 v/v for the year 2015 [13]. This figure was recently revised to 180 v/v [14][15][16] (the volume of gas adsorbed at standard temperature and pressure: 298 K, 0.1 MPa, per volume of the storage vessel) or equivalently 35 wt% [17] at 3.5 MPa according to the U.S. Department of Energy.…”

Section: Ch 4 Gas and Storage For Vehicular Energymentioning

confidence: 99%

A review: methane capture by nanoporous carbon materials for automobiles

Choi¹,

Jeong²,

Choi³

et al. 2016

Carbon letters

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Global warming is considered one of the great challenges of the twenty-first century. In order to reduce the ever-increasing amount of methane (CH 4 ) released into the atmosphere, and thus its impact on global climate change, CH 4 storage technologies are attracting significant research interest. CH 4 storage processes are attracting technological interest, and methane is being applied as an alternative fuel for vehicles. CH 4 storage involves many technologies, among which, adsorption processes such as processes using porous adsorbents are regarded as an important green and economic technology. It is very important to develop highly efficient adsorbents to realize techno-economic systems for CH 4 adsorption and storage. In this review, we summarize the nanomaterials being used for CH 4 adsorption, which are divided into non-carbonaceous (e.g., zeolites, metal-organic frameworks, and porous polymers) and carbonaceous materials (e.g., activated carbons, ordered porous carbons, and activated carbon fibers), with a focus on recent research.

show abstract

Section: Ch 4 Gas and Storage For Vehicular Energymentioning

confidence: 99%

A review: methane capture by nanoporous carbon materials for automobiles

Choi¹,

Jeong²,

Choi³

et al. 2016

Carbon letters

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As a natural adsorbent, coal has a great methane adsorption capacity. However, compared with other adsorbents, such as Maxsorb III, ACF, and MOFs [3], the diversity of the macerals, variations in mineral species, and an uneven distribution of pores and fractures in coal create inhomogeneous methane adsorption characteristics [4][5][6], rendering an evaluation of the storage characteristics difficult, and hindering the industrial exploitation of CBM reserves. Past studies have shown that the micro pores (<10 nm) in coal are the main sites of methane storage owing to their large surface area, and that the intercrystalline pores and intragranular corrosion pores of clay minerals also have a fair methane adsorption capacity [1,2,7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Experimental meso scale study on the distribution and evolution of methane adsorption in coal

Zhou

Feng

Zhao

et al. 2017

Applied Thermal Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Gordeeva analyzed the composite adsorbent of silica gel/LiCl. The researchers have studied its applications in the fields of gas storage, 15,16 separation, 17 catalysis, 18 and drug delivery. Other common adsorbents are faujasite type (FAU) zeolite and Linde Type A (LTA) zeolite.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…When the heat source temperature, the cooling water temperature, and the evaporation temperature are about 86.7°C, 29.6°C, and −0.8°C, the COP and SCP still can reach 0 16. When the methanol is used as the adsorbate, the evaporation temperature can be below zero.…”

mentioning

confidence: 98%

Experimental and theoretical performance analysis of the silica gel, LiCl with water, methanol multifunction adsorption system

2019

Int J Energy Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary The world is facing the ever‐worsening issues of global warming. The results show that the physical‐/chemical‐adsorbent water can improve the adsorption capacity of 1.22 kg/kg. If water is used as the adsorbate, the adsorbent has a serious issue of corrosion. So, methanol is utilized. However, methanol just can be heated by low‐temperature heat, because methanol will be broken down in above 140°C adsorption system. The multifunction adsorption system can produce one cold effect output and two power generation outputs. The results show that the silica gel/LiCl‐methanol multifunction adsorption system has a higher cooling exergy efficiency of 0.25 and a higher total system exergy efficiency of 0.87 compared with that of the silica gel‐water system.

show abstract

Study of metal-organic framework MIL-101(Cr) for natural gas (methane) storage and compare with other MOFs (metal-organic frameworks)

Cited by 140 publications

References 63 publications

A review: methane capture by nanoporous carbon materials for automobiles

A review: methane capture by nanoporous carbon materials for automobiles

Experimental meso scale study on the distribution and evolution of methane adsorption in coal

Experimental and theoretical performance analysis of the silica gel, LiCl with water, methanol multifunction adsorption system

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About