In connection with studies on the rate and route of dispersal of small amounts of radiolabeled allergens--picryl chloride and dinitrochlorobenzene--from intradermal ear sites (1), the result of extirpating the injected ears at various fixed times was explored with regard to its affecting the capacity to develop contact hypersensitivity to the chemical allergen in question. The plan was to differentiate between immunologic effects of (a) chemical which had already escaped from the ear site and (b) the remaining portion which remained fixed locally for many hours or even days.Experiments of a similar type, but based on epicutaneous absorption of chemical allergens, had been undertaken by others. Frey and Wenk (2-4) extirpated sites on the flank of guinea pigs, on which 0.4--1.0 mg of 2:4 dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) had been deposited on a 3 mm area, and studied the critical period for interrupting onset of sensitivity and the effect of removing draining lymph nodes; the fate of the applied chemical was not traced. Turk et al., in extensive studies (5-7), applied large amounts, 5-20 mg, of allergens to the ear and studied the effects of removal of the ear and of the draining node at various times, as well as the cellular changes observed within the draining node. 1*Clabeled dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) was also used (7) in tracing resultant soluble dinitrophenyl-protein complexes in their passage through the lymphatic system.Our findings have been different. Sensitization could be prevented if the site of injection was excised many hours or days after the injection, much longer than the workers quoted above, yet the chemical was found to escape readily from the site of deposition via the local blood vessels, and surprisingly not via the lymphatics. The differences in the pathways taken by chemical allergens and soluble proteins after intradermal injections appear to rest chiefly on the physicochemical properties of the allergenic chemicals such as molecular weight, lipid solu-