2018
DOI: 10.1515/chem-2018-0013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on the flammability of polypropylene/ammonium polyphosphate and montmorillonite by using the cone calorimeter test

Abstract: Fire performance of polypropylene (PP) containing different percentages of ammonium polyphosphate (APP) with montmorillonite (Mt) or treated montmorillonite (MtT) was carried out by using the cone calorimeter test (CCT). Different samples from ammonium polyphosphate and montmorillonite were mixed with 90% polypropylene. The characterization of the prepared samples indicates that there is incorporation between the components of the samples. Heat release rate (HRR), peak heat release rate (PHRR), average heat re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The average burning rate of neat PP is slightly higher than that of neat PLA, and the pHRR, average HRR and THR for the neat PP is approximately 2 times higher than that for neat PLA. The reason why PP has high flammability is that PP consists of carbon and hydrogen (Hanna et al 2018). Furthermore, the calorific value of PP (43 MJ/kg) is higher than that of PLA (18 MJ/kg) (Castro-Aguirre et al 2016) and PP has a smaller LOI value than PLA.…”
Section: Flammability Properties Of the Neat Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average burning rate of neat PP is slightly higher than that of neat PLA, and the pHRR, average HRR and THR for the neat PP is approximately 2 times higher than that for neat PLA. The reason why PP has high flammability is that PP consists of carbon and hydrogen (Hanna et al 2018). Furthermore, the calorific value of PP (43 MJ/kg) is higher than that of PLA (18 MJ/kg) (Castro-Aguirre et al 2016) and PP has a smaller LOI value than PLA.…”
Section: Flammability Properties Of the Neat Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Symbols are indicative of different types of phosphorus flame retardant used. Here: ■ APP-10 [ 24 ], APP-12, APP-15 [ 25 ], APP-20 [ 26 ], APP-20 [ 27 ], APP-20 [ 28 ], APP-20 [ 23 ], APP-25 [ 29 ], APP-25 [ 30 ], APP-25 [ 31 ], APP-25 [ 32 ], APP-25 [ 33 ], APP-25 [ 34 ], APP-25, m-APP-25 [ 35 ], APP-25, mc-APP-25 [ 36 ], m-APP-25 [ 37 ], APP-30 [ 38 ], APP-30 [ 39 ], APP-30 [ 40 ], mc-APP-30 [ 41 ], APP-30, mc-APP-30 [ 42 ], APP-30, mc-APP-30 [ 43 ], APP-30, mc-APP-30 [ 44 ], APP-30, mc-APP-5, mc-APP-10, mc-APP-15, mc-APP-20, mc-APP-25, mc-APP-30 [ 45 ], APP-35, m-APP-35 [ 46 ], APP-35, m-APP-35 [ 47 ], APP-40, mc-APP-40 [ 48 ], APP-25, P-CA-25 [ 49 ], APP-25 [ 50 ], APP-IFR-20 [ ...…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the matrix, a wide number of papers about flame retardants and mineral fillers for polymers [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] can be easily found. Flame retardants (FR) are substances that are added to combustible materials, such as plastic, to prevent fire or reduce the spread of fire to provide additional escape time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%